| viXra.org > Quantum Physics > 2012 |
 |
 |
| viXra.org > Quantum Physics > 2012 |
|
|
[14] viXra:2012.0230 [pdf] submitted on 2020-12-31 21:13:23
Authors: Kazmer Ujvarosy
Comments: 7 Pages. [Corrections made by viXra Admin to conform with the requirements on the Submission Form]
Based on a thought experiment the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paper’s authors concluded that in quantum mechanics the mathematical objects called wave functions fail to describe the physical reality and consequently quantum theory is incomplete. They left open the question of whether or not a complete description of the physical reality exists, but expressed their belief that such a complete theory is possible. In this paper I show that indeed a theory that gives a complete description of the physical reality exists.
Category: Quantum Physics
[13] viXra:2012.0203 [pdf] submitted on 2020-12-28 08:30:51
Authors: Jean Louis Van Belle
Comments: 14 Pages.
This paper shows how one can use potentials to build up a spin-zero model of the deuteron. The spin-zero model consists of a proton, and another proton plus an electron which combine in an electrically neutral particle which we refer to as the neutron. We treat all particles as spin-zero particles because we assume their magnetic moment is zero. As such, it may complement Paolo Di Sia’s model of the nucleus (2018), which we give due attention. In contrast to Di Sia, we think of neutrons – or the electron cloud that surrounds the proton inside – as electric dipoles.
The model does so by interpretating Yukawa’s potential function as a dipole potential. Instead of predefining the range parameter a, we calculate it from the equilibrium condition (equal but opposite magnitudes of the Coulomb and nuclear forces). We find a very acceptable value of about 2.88 fm for a, and find an equally acceptable value for the distance between the positively charged center of the neutron and the center of the electron cloud which, in a deuteron nucleus, must shift it center of charge towards the proton so as to ensure stability – not unlike the sharing of valence electrons in chemical bonds.
Category: Quantum Physics
[12] viXra:2012.0192 [pdf] submitted on 2020-12-25 16:54:02
Authors: Dmitri Martila
Comments: 5 Pages.
It is instrumental interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Why this new interpretation is needed Because all known interpretations only describe how Quantum Mechanics works, so that one can be able to apply equations, but do not answer the question: "why did nature need Quantum Mechanics at all?"
Category: Quantum Physics
[11] viXra:2012.0188 [pdf] submitted on 2020-12-26 03:41:55
Authors: V.A. Kuz`menko
Comments: 6 Pages.
The physical nature of the nonrandom quantum phenomena of bunching-antibunching of photons in a beam splitter is discussed. The physical explanation is based on the fact that the forward and reverse processes are not equivalent in quantum physics. The possibility and necessity of an experimental study of the nonlocality of memory of quantum systems is also discussed.
Category: Quantum Physics
[10] viXra:2012.0176 [pdf] submitted on 2020-12-24 20:19:08
Authors: Cameron Wong
Comments: 1 Page.
Everyone studying photoelectric effect must know this equation
E_max=hf-W (Eq.01)
where E_max is said to represent the maximum kinetic energy that a photoelectron carries when flying across the electrodes, h is the Planck constant, f is the frequency of an incident light, and W is the so-called work function. Based on this equation, a concept called photon, then further called quantum, is firmly rooted in modern physics.
Category: Quantum Physics
[9] viXra:2012.0154 [pdf] replaced on 2022-01-16 22:51:21
Authors: Felix Lev
Comments: 16 Pages. Published in Physics of Particles and Nuclei Letters, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 729-737 - published by Springer Nature
Following the results of our publications, in the first part of this letter, we explain that quantum theory based on finite mathematics (FQT) is more general (fundamental) than standard quantum theory based on Poincare invariance. Standard concept of particle-antiparticle is not universal because it arises as a result of symmetry breaking from FQT to standard quantum theory based on Poincare or standard anti-de Sitter symmetries. In FQT one irreducible representation of the symmetry algebra describes a particle and its antiparticle simultaneously, and there are
no conservation laws of electric charge and baryon quantum number. Poincare and standard anti-de Sitter symmetry are good approximations
at the present stage of the universe but in the early stages they cannot take place. Therefore, the statement that in such stages the numbers of baryons and antibaryons were the same, does not have a physical meaning, and the problem of baryon asymmetry of the universe does not arise. Analogously, the numbers of positive and negative electric charges at the present stage of the universe should not be the same, i.e., the total electric charge of the universe should not be zero.
Category: Quantum Physics
[8] viXra:2012.0149 [pdf] submitted on 2020-12-20 09:27:47
Authors: Sjaak Uitterdijk
Comments: 3 Pages.
Given the evidence that a photon is a short period of an electromagnetic wave with a well defined amount of energy, the theory how light can cause an electron to escape from a metal can easily be shown to be the reverse process.
Category: Quantum Physics
[7] viXra:2012.0147 [pdf] replaced on 2020-12-22 19:48:03
Authors: Jean Louis Van Belle
Comments: 19 Pages.
The special problem we try to get at with these lectures is to maintain the interest of the very enthusiastic and rather smart people trying to understand physics. They have heard a lot about how interesting and exciting physics is—the theory of relativity, quantum mechanics, and other modern ideas—and spend many years studying textbooks or following online courses. Many are discouraged because there are really very few grand, new, modern ideas presented to them. Also, when they ask too many questions in the course, they are usually told to just shut up and calculate. Hence, we were wondering whether or not we can make a course which would save them by maintaining their enthusiasm. This paper is a draft of the fifth chapter of such course. It offers a comprehensive overview of the complementarity of wave- and particle-like perspectives on electromagnetic (EM) waves and radiation. We finish with a few remarks on relativity.
Category: Quantum Physics
[6] viXra:2012.0089 [pdf] replaced on 2020-12-17 19:10:28
Authors: Espen Gaarder Haug
Comments: 47 Pages.
In this paper we will show that standard physics to a large degree consists of derivatives of a deeper reality. This means standard physics is both overly complex and also incomplete. Modern physics has typically started from working with first understanding the surface of the world, that is typically the macroscopic world, and then forming theories about the atomic and subatomic world. And we did not have much of a choice, as the subatomic world is very hard to observe directly, if not impossible to observe directly at the deepest level. Despite the enormous success of modern physics, it is therefore no big surprise that we at some point have possibly taken a step in the wrong direction. We will claim that one such step came when one thought that the de Broglie wavelength represented a real matter wavelength. We will claim that the Compton wavelength is the real matter wavelength. Based on such a view we will see that many equations in modern physics are only derivatives of much simpler relations. Second, we will claim that in today’s physics one uses two different mass definitions, one mass definition that is complete or at least more complete, embedded in gravity equations without being aware of it, as it is concealed in GM, and the standard, but incomplete, kg mass definition in non-gravitational physics. First, when this is understood, and one uses the more complete mass definition that is embedded in gravity physics, not only in gravity physics, but in all of physics, then one has a chance to unify gravity and quantum mechanics. Our new theory shows that most physical phenomena when observed over a very short timescale are probabilistic for masses smaller than a Planck mass and dominated by determinism at or above Planck mass size.
Our findings have many implications. For example, we show that the Heisenberg uncertainty principle is rooted in a foundation not valid for rest-mass particles, so the Heisenberg uncertainty principle can say nothing about rest-masses. When re-formulated based on a foundation compatible with a new momentum that is also compatible with rest-masses, we obtain a re-defined Heisenberg principle that seems to become a certainty principle in the special case of a Planck mass particle. Furthermore, we show that the Planck mass particle is linked to gravity and that we can easily detect the Planck scale from gravity observations.
Category: Quantum Physics
[5] viXra:2012.0084 [pdf] submitted on 2020-12-11 08:40:51
Authors: Cameron Wong
Comments: 8 Pages.
Bohr model and Planck constant are destructive to each other
Category: Quantum Physics
[4] viXra:2012.0074 [pdf] submitted on 2020-12-10 19:34:34
Authors: Jiri Soucek
Comments: 6 Pages.
The standard Bell’s theorem states that quantum mechanics (QM) cannot be locally realistic. Here we prove the strong Bell’s theorem which states that QM cannot be realistic. In the proof we use the Mermin’s form of the Bell’s theorem. Our result solves the old dilemma: non-locality or non-realism. Then we discuss the consequences of the strong Bell’s theorem, e.g. that no Bell non-locality of QM exists and that quantum theory is local and non-realistic.
Category: Quantum Physics
[3] viXra:2012.0059 [pdf] replaced on 2020-12-14 19:18:13
Authors: Sjaak Uitterdijk
Comments: 5 Pages. In version 2 only chapter 5 has been modified
This theoretical investigation started at the moment the author picked up a hot piece of metal that had lain in the sun during a few hours, by asking himself the question: how can electro-magnetic radiation, considered at atomic level, cause raising the temperature of matter? The answer to that question has been found. However another question popped up (again): why are the orbits of electrons in an atom quantified? Only exactly orbiting at radii proportional to the square of integers is suspicious unnatural. Indeed, unless we define such a behaviour as natural of course.
Category: Quantum Physics
[2] viXra:2012.0047 [pdf] submitted on 2020-12-08 10:47:59
Authors: Bernard Riley
Comments: 16 Pages. Including 17 figures
When observed, macroscopic lengths and distances, and elapsed times, adopt values that in Planck units are equal to integer, half-integer, quarter-integer, eighth-integer, etc powers of π or e. The values of the parameters then lie on the levels and sub-levels of two geometric sequences that ascend from Planck scale with common ratio π and e, respectively. Closely coincident levels and sub-levels in the two sequences are the most probable locations for the parameters of conspicuous objects. Many parameters are considered: earthly, astronomical and of the universe.
Category: Quantum Physics
[1] viXra:2012.0021 [pdf] replaced on 2021-03-14 19:59:59
Authors: Nicolae Mazilu
Comments: 184 Pages.
We uphold a general viewpoint that the ideas have their own ‘objective’ dynamics,
that is a dynamics independent of personalities. Every now and then, the ideas are accessible to
individuals. When it comes to social expression, though, it is only a genius, among individuals,
who can reach such an accessible idea as ultimate truth, even to the point where he/she succeeds
to casting it into proper words, available to society at large. Beyond those words no one can
‘rationalize’, not even the genius himself. We illustrate this observation with Erwin Schrödinger’s
interpretation of the wave function introduced by him to common knowledge, which has been cast
into proper words by another genius, Richard Feynman, who, nevertheless, honestly acknowledged
mistrusting that interpretation. In fact, Feynman always openly admitted, and effectively exercised
the probabilistic interpretation of Max Born. To wit, it is guided by this kind of interpretation, that
he has built the well-known version of wave mechanics, which is based entirely on the concept of
probability. We argue that Feynman was actually right on both accounts – Schrödinger’s and
Born’s interpretations – and show here why and how, thus revealing a few missing points in the
contemporary natural philosophy. The whole argument, and the accompanying illustration, stands
completely by the words of still another genius of modern physics: Louis de Broglie, whose
physics is documented and developed in the present work. The construction of this physics gives
us the opportunity of a historical review of significant moments of the physical knowledge
Category: Quantum Physics
| Third-Party Links: |
|