| viXra.org > Quantum Physics > 2009 |
 |
 |
| viXra.org > Quantum Physics > 2009 |
|
|
[11] viXra:2009.0193 [pdf] submitted on 2020-09-28 08:26:56
Authors: Gerard van der Ham
Comments: 1 Page.
Perspective is essential in the account for Quantum Mechanic correlation in Bell-test experiments.
Category: Quantum Physics
[10] viXra:2009.0190 [pdf] replaced on 2020-09-29 21:28:53
Authors: Moninder Singh Modgil
Comments: 3 Pages.
Finite size of the $S^3$ universe suggests that the maximum spatial uncertainty should be $({\Delta} x)_{Max}=2{\pi} R_{Univ}$, where $R_{Univ}$ is the radius of the universe. It follows from the Position-Momentum uncertainty principle ${\Delta}x{\Delta}p \geq h/2{\pi}$, that there exists a minimum uncertainty in the momentum - i.e., $({\Delta}p)_{Min}=h/(2{\pi})^2 R_{Univ}$. Similarly, the finite duration $T$ of the $S^1$ Time Cycle, suggests that the maximum temporal uncertainty is $({\Delta}t)_{Max}=T$. It follows from the Time-Energy uncertainty principle ${\Delta}E{\Delta}t \geq h/2{\pi}$, that there exists a minimum uncertainty in the energy - i.e., $({\Delta}E)_{Min}=h/2{\pi}T$. These consideration suggest the following conclusions - (1) Quantum states with ${\Delta}E \leq ({\Delta}E)_{Min}$ and ${\Delta}p \leq ({\Delta}p)_{Min}$ will be indistinguishable, (2) It should be possible to determine radius of the finite $S^3$ universe, i.e., $R_{Univ}=h/[(2{\pi})2({\Delta}p)_{Min}]$, by locally measuring $({\Delta}p)_{Min}$ , and (3) Determine duration of the universe's time cycle, $T=h/2{\pi}({\Delta}E)_{Min}$ , by locally measuring $({\Delta}E)_{Min} . . If one considers the 5000 years Time Cycle T, and 5000 light years radius of the S3 universe - as propunded by Brahma Kumaris; one obtains the prediction $(\Delta p)Min= 2.230893507958458×〖10〗^(-53) kg m/s$; and $(\Delta E)Min= 6.688050482871086×〖10〗^(-45)$ Joules.
Category: Quantum Physics
[9] viXra:2009.0189 [pdf] submitted on 2020-09-27 19:57:16
Authors: Francois Zinserling
Comments: 38 Pages.
Fractional charges are not required to represent elementary particles, shown here through analysis of elementary charge equations. This paper offers a speculative proposal for a structural model of the proton and neutron, with intuitive nucleus and atom structure, containing elementary particles of only integer charges. This proposal also seems to provide answers to some of the less understood current observations, such as missing anti-matter, proton stability, electron capture, neutron instability, helium stability, and may merit further investigation to improve our understanding of atomic nuclei.
Category: Quantum Physics
[8] viXra:2009.0146 [pdf] submitted on 2020-09-21 10:36:37
Authors: Gerard van der Ham
Comments: 2 Pages.
This paper shows that the reasoning leading to non-locality of the universe is caused by the idea that electrons of entangled pairs choose their spin randomly when being measured. A model exists that perfectly accounts for the Quantum Mechanic correlation in Bell-test experiments in a local-real way. It is based on the assumption that entangled electrons have definite opposite spin. In that case Bell's inequalities (and his theorem) are not applicable to spin measurement of entangled electrons so there is no need for a non-local universe.
Category: Quantum Physics
[7] viXra:2009.0103 [pdf] submitted on 2020-09-14 08:27:21
Authors: Gerard van der Ham
Comments: 2 Pages.
In Bell-test experiments the projection of spinvectors of entangled electrons is detected. To get the correct results the perspective of the electrons has to be taken into account. It must also be assumed that electrons of entangled pairs have fixed opposite spin. Based on these assumptions the Quantum Mechanic correlation in Bell-test experiments is perfectly explicable.
Category: Quantum Physics
[6] viXra:2009.0098 [pdf] submitted on 2020-09-13 19:40:27
Authors: Jonathan Deutsch
Comments: 5 Pages.
There is only one strength of gravity, not two, so Newton’s gravitational constant, G, MUST equal the gravitational-structure constant, Gmproton2/hc. This totally new equation yields another new equation, 6.6728674 X 10-8 cm3/gm sec2 = .9397908 X 10-39. Solving this latter equation yields two solutions: [mproton = de Broglie λproton = tproton = 1]; and [mproton = 1; λproton = ─1; tproton = √−1]. We notice the preponderance of the number 1; 1 =1/1 = 100% = wholeness.
We can set up a generalized equation, G = Gm2/hc, for ALL m, not just for mproton. Shockingly, it too is solved only by: 1)[m= λ=t=1]; and 2) [m=1; λ= ─1; t= √−1], for all m, λ and t in each case. Again, we notice the preponderance of the number 1 in nature - - wholeness.
Examining 1), we will derive three new equations: t=c; h=t; and λ=E. Respectively, these mean that time is really the speed of light; the quantum of action is time; and wavelength or distance (space) is energy. We also will derive E=m - - Einstein’s mass-energy equivalence. Examining 2), we will also derive three new equations: t=c, h= ─t; and λ=E. The quantum of action is thus a unit of backwards and/or forwards time. We will derive E= ─m in case 2).
Since E=m AND E= ─m, ─m=m, or ─1=1. ─1=1 implies that ─n=n, n being any real number, positive or negative. We recall that all of nature can be represented by pure numbers - - i.e., by numbers without units. Therefore, at the deepest level of reality, ─x=x for all x. In words: all opposites of any kind in the entire universe are ultimately “married” to each other, 2 as 1. Even life and death are really the same one thing. Thus, the conclusions of our previous paper, “Duality or Unity in Quantum Mechanics?”, have now been proven.
Category: Quantum Physics
[5] viXra:2009.0095 [pdf] submitted on 2020-09-13 10:29:53
Authors: Wen-Xiang Chen, Zhi-Qiao Wang
Comments: 4 Pages.
Hasegawa Yuji of the Vienna University of Technology and Masaaki Ozawa of Nagoya University and other scholars published empirical results against Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle on January 15, 2012.They got a measurement result with a smaller error than the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, which proved the measurement advocated by the Heisenberg uncertainty principle.This article follows the method I used to study superradiation and connects the uncertainty principle with the superradiation effect. I found that under the superradiation effect, the measurement limit of the uncertainty principle can be smaller.
Category: Quantum Physics
[4] viXra:2009.0065 [pdf] submitted on 2020-09-09 10:59:44
Authors: Gerard van der Ham
Comments: 2 pages
Applying perspective, projection and assuming fixed opposite spin, Quantum Mechanic correlation is perfectly explicable. Bell's theorem is not applicable to spin detection of entangled electrons because he didn't assume fixed opposite spin of entangled electrons.
Category: Quantum Physics
[3] viXra:2009.0060 [pdf] replaced on 2020-09-22 07:35:59
Authors: Domenico Oricchio
Comments: 4 Pages.
I try to prove that the entropy is a invariant in a isolated system. I write a possible photon quantum equation to obtain the associated flow of entropy in the gauge bosons.
Category: Quantum Physics
[2] viXra:2009.0053 [pdf] submitted on 2020-09-07 10:02:37
Authors: Shaolong Wang
Comments: 4 Pages. The solution of double slit interference experiment
The phenomenon of double-slit interference is not an attribute of the electron itself, but is caused by the fluctuation of space. Because of the big bang of the universe, there has always been an explosion afterwave in space. I call it " universe ripple". This kind of ripple is hard to be felt in the macro world. However, for particles with very small mass such as electrons and photons, the effect of such ripples can not be ignored.
Category: Quantum Physics
[1] viXra:2009.0032 [pdf] submitted on 2020-09-04 11:10:14
Authors: J. Foukzon, E. R. Men'kova
Comments: 2 Pages.
Here we want to report an unfortunate misprint in our paper Comment on “The Mössbauer rotor experiment and the general theory of relativity” [Ann. Physics 368 (2016) 258-266], which was published in Annals of Physic 368 (2016) 258-266
Category: Quantum Physics
| Third-Party Links: |
|