[5] viXra:2402.0150 [pdf] submitted on 2024-02-25 23:46:38
Authors: Norbert Buchholz
Comments: 9 Pages.
We had already dealt with the neutron enigma in an earlier paper5 and calculated values that were in excellent agreement with the decay times determined experimentally for the two measurement methods solely on the basis of the underlying masses or mass differences. However, this approach was formal, as no knowledge of the decay mechanisms was available and consequently the individual calculation steps could not be justified. The solution approach presented here was based on the neutron decay mechanism described in a recent publication 1 for calculating the decay curve. In combination with the specific structure of the two competing measurement methods, it was possible to predict that, in contrast to the bottle method,energy is continuously extracted from the system in the beam method, which leads to an increase in the lifetime of the neutrons, since energy and decay time are indirectly proportional, as already explained in the paper 5 cited at the beginning. The energy loss during the beam experiment could be quantified on the basis of a simple calculation model. From the resulting residual energy, it was possible to calculate the decay time, which corresponds to that measured by Greene3 within the standard deviation. From the knowledge of the overall mechanism outlined above, some experimental modifications for the beam method can be proposed, which should lead to an approximation of the decay times for both methods:- A reduction in diameter for the beam tube- An increase in the suction voltage to remove the proton- A reduction in the particle density in the beam tube If these experimental changes lead in the direction we predicted, we can consider the neutron enigma solved.
Category: Nuclear and Atomic Physics
[4] viXra:2402.0122 [pdf] replaced on 2024-03-07 23:40:19
Authors: Norbert Buchholz
Comments: 19 Pages. (Corrections made by viXra Admin: Author name is required on the article in pdf)
In this work we have used the classical neutron model of proton and nuclear electron in combination with the findings of projection theory, according to which the neutron is a cube and its interior lies below the spatial resolution, where the physical laws of our space-time world only apply to a limited extent and consequently the objections raised against this model by established physics do not apply. The electron does not reside in the entire cubic interior, but in a potential sphere (r = 6.355181 10-16 m) around the positron. This potential space is statistically occupied by the electron by random jumps with a jump duration of tmin. From the statistical frequency of the individual potential energies, the mean mass of the neutron was calculated to be 1.674927328 . 10-27 kg. The potential jumps mentioned above lead to a change in the size of the neutron at a constant elementary particle density in the rhythm of the jumps (oscillation model). The β-decay is caused by jumps of the electron to the outer surface of the neutron, where they are ejected from the neutron by membrane oscillation, whereby only 1/6 of the oscillation energy is transferred to the electron as kinetic energy. This is the real secret of the missing energy in the decay spectrum of the neutron. Two curves were constructed to calculate the decay curve. The base curve reflects the energetic and geometric conditions in the potential space of the electron, while the second, the jump curve, takes into account the individual jumps to the respective points on the neutron surface. The superposition of these two curves resulted in a curve that is in excellent agreement with the experimentally determined curves, in which the irregular curve progression at the maximum of the measurement curves is also very well reproduced, which to our knowledge is not the case with the calculations of established physicists. Neutrinos are not required in our obviously accurate model. In the last section, the conversion factor between time and length was calculated as 1 m4/3/s for the interior of the neutron. This contradicts the calculations of the same factor for the world outside the neutron with 61.66801 m4/3/s, which impressively confirms our initial hypothesis of deviating physics inside the neutron.
Category: Nuclear and Atomic Physics
[3] viXra:2402.0099 [pdf] submitted on 2024-02-19 22:02:18
Authors: Brian Beverly
Comments: 5 Pages.
A simple derivation of alpha, the fine structure constant, using Coulomb's law and the Planck-Einstein relations. I argue that alpha represents the minimum uncertainty between wavenumber and radial distance. This is like the uncertainty between momentum (wavelength) and position. The fine structure constant is related to this uncertainty principle but in spherical coordinates using wavenumber for momentum and radius for distance. Wavenumber is defined as the inverse of the wavelength per unit distance. This is equivalent to saying that alpha is about 137 wavelengths per unit distance of radius. I go on to show this provides the correct ionization wavelengths for the hydrogen atom. Using whole integers, n number of energy levels, allowed me to derive the Rydberg formula. Alpha is nearly an integer number because we are using a wavenumber. It is not a mystery to find integer values when wavenumbers are used. This derivation is equivalent to that of the Bohr model but without needing to use classical ideas of electrons in orbit around the nucleus like planets in orbit around the sun.
Category: Nuclear and Atomic Physics
[2] viXra:2402.0084 [pdf] submitted on 2024-02-17 01:38:06
Authors: Preston Guynn
Comments: 2 Pages.
The physical basis of the fine structure constant is relativistic rotational motion. Matter and its interactions consist of space time structures of rotational motion. The results of the model match experimentally determined values to within 1 part in 10^11.
Category: Nuclear and Atomic Physics
[1] viXra:2402.0006 [pdf] submitted on 2024-02-02 20:43:35
Authors: Viktor S. Dolgikh
Comments: 8 Pages.
This work will describe the structural formation and mechanism of action of Gravitational quanta and the entire spectrum of Electromagnetic waves from their generating "Zugs".It is a continuation of the work 1701.0488 with some clarification and addition.
Category: Nuclear and Atomic Physics