[2] viXra:1008.0059 [pdf] submitted on 21 Aug 2010
Authors: Kiyoung Kim
Comments: 37 Pages.
It is inferred from the phenomenological facts of tornado that tornado itself should have a driving
force generating the updraft in the vortex of tornado. The driving force is supposed to be originated
from the electric interaction between a storm cloud and a crustal conducting body underground. The
electric interaction in tornado is considered to be similar to a lightning discharge in respect that the
electric potential is reduced between a storm cloud and the ground, but the electric discharging
process in tornado should be much slower than the lightning discharge and result in the atmospheric
vortex formation of tornado. The mechanism of tornado formation is suggested, in which Townsend
avalanche process is assumed inside the tornado vortex with a dangling conducting channel that is
embedded in the funnel cloud of tornado. The strong updraft inside the vortex of tornado is
produced by momentum diffusion process when the positively ionized air molecules move upward
under the influence of electric field inside the vortex. With the mechanism of tornado formation,
phenomenological expectations are followed.
Category: Classical Physics
[1] viXra:1008.0017 [pdf] submitted on 8 Aug 2010
Authors: John Michael Williams
Comments:
12 pages.
Elementary calculations show that the mass of the passenger's vehicle should
have an important influence on risk of injury, greater mass yielding greater
protection independent of the other mass(es) in the collision. This holds for
collisions treated either as purely elastic, or as quasi-inelastic. Passengers in more
massive vehicles thus would seem better off no matter what the size or weight of
other vehicle(s) in a collision.
The approximations used suggest that highway vehicles should be at least 20
times the mass of the average passenger, or injuries in a collision will be
disproportionately grave.
Category: Classical Physics