Statistics

   

Classical vs Path Coupling on a Geometric State Space: Glauber Dynamics for (q)-Colorings of (C_n)

Authors: Iz Tecum

We analyze one coupling of single-site Glauber dynamics for proper (q)-colorings of the cycle (C_n) in two ways.Drift on the Hamming disagreement count and path coupling on Hamming-adjacent pairs give the one-step contractions[mathbb{E}bigl[d_{H}(X_1,Y_1)bigr]lealpha_{mathrm{cl}}(q,n),d_{H}(X_0,Y_0),qquadmathbb{E}bigl[d_{G}(X_1,Y_1)bigr]lealpha_{mathrm{pc}}(q,n),d_{G}(X_0,Y_0),]with (alpha_{mathrm{cl}}(q,n)=1-(q-4)/bigl(n(q-2)bigr)) and (alpha_{mathrm{pc}}(q,n)=1-(q-6)/bigl(n(q-2)bigr)), both attained. The thresholds are(qge5) and (qge7), and the constants separate by (2/bigl(n(q-2)bigr)) uniformly in (n). The gap is geometric.Transposing two colors across an edge produces a pair at Hamming distance (2) that no single recoloring connects,so the path metric (d_{G}) of the color graph charges a created disagreement (+2) rather than (+1); such pairspack (lfloor n/2floor) to a cycle, giving (operatorname{diam} d_{H}=n) and (operatorname{diam} d_{G}=lfloor3n/2floor) for(qge5), hence closed (O(nlog n)) bounds for both methods. The loss is attributable to the sparse edge setrather than to path coupling, since the complete edge set recovers (alpha_{mathrm{cl}}). Exact enumeration on (C_4)confirms every bound and gives worst-start (t_{mathrm{mix}}(0.05)=57,29,22,19,18) for (q=3,dots,7).

Comments: 26 Pages.

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2026-08-07 05:37:17

Unique-IP document downloads: 0 times

Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus