Authors: Renato Vieira dos Santos
We construct a nonlinear extension of Fermi's electrodynamics by incorporating a Born--Infeld structure that depends directly on the four-potential $A_mu$ rather than on the field strength $F_{muu}$. The resulting theory, which we call Fermi--Born--Infeld (FBI) electrodynamics, eliminates the $U(1)$ gauge redundancy by elevating the Lorenz gauge to a dynamical condition. The Lagrangian is built from the determinant of a metric-like tensor $g_{muu} = eta_{muu} + 2kappa, partial_{(mu} A_{u)}$, ensuring that the canonical energy--momentum tensor and the spin density remain unique and free of gauge ambiguities. We derive the field equations, which reduce to $partial_u(sqrt{-g}, g^{muu}) = 0$, and show that the Lorenz condition $partial_mu A^mu = 0$ emerges dynamically from retarded boundary conditions and the requirement of a positive-energy spectrum. The nonlinearities modify the propagation of longitudinal modes; we argue, via a Vainshtein-like mechanism, that the nonlinear self-interactions may stabilize the longitudinal mode, opening the possibility of a stable massive scalar photon under extreme field conditions. We also compute the spin density from the Noether current and discuss its properties. The FBI theory preserves the physical gauge of Fermi's original formulation while incorporating the regularization features of Born--Infeld electrodynamics, making it a candidate for describing electromagnetic phenomena in strong-field regimes.
Comments: 12 Pages.
Download: PDF
[v1] 2026-07-07 14:14:14
Unique-IP document downloads: 34 times
Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.