Authors: Leo Vuyk
What is wrong with Physics according to Quantum FFF Theory? 1: Gravity is a dual Pressure Force. ( Dipole repeller) 2: The Vacuum has resistance for ALL motion. 3: Lorentz polarization of propeller shaped Rigid String Fermions is the compensation to keep the original motion in space. 4: Fermion Inertia is the transition process for Lorentz polarization. 5: Black Holes Repel ALL Fermions. 6: the lightspeed is variable by gravity influence of the vacuum frame. 7: The Raspberry Multiverse has 8 or 12 symmetric anti- copy universes, which is the origin of uncertainty, Human Consciousness and Lorentz polarization memory. (inertia) How could we test this new physics? According to Quantum FFF Theory, (Function Follows Form) the process of wave function collapse of two entangled particles into mirror symmetrical states, is the basic process for all created particles. As a consequence, we should live inside one part of a mirror Charge-Parity-symmetrical entangled copy MULTIVERSE with one central origin the big bang. We will give it the name: Raspberry Multiverse. Even human choice making should be subjected to this mirror symmetrical process. Benjamin Libet described a choice experiment, which we could use to measure how many copy universes there should be. At the smaller scale however, we observe also entanglement effects between particles. Einstein called them “spooky action at a distance”, which he did not like and suggested a different explanation called “Hidden Variables”. However I present here a support for the spooky faster than light entanglement explanation, based on an extended Stern Gerlach experiment, in line with J.S Bell’s arguments about a strange aspect of the original experiment. That even the lightspeed constancy theory should be adapted, by a different Michelson Morley experiment seems to be a logic result of the Quantum FFF Model..
Comments: 26 Pages.
Unique-IP document downloads: 138 times
Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.