Mathematical Physics


Matter, Antimatter, Dark Matter and Space-Time Travel in an Infinite and Eternal Universe with Extra Dimensions

Authors: Rodney Bartlett

When his paper regarding mathematical formulas creating reality was submitted to a scientific journal and rejected as being too speculative, U.S. cosmologist Max Tegmark showed the rejection letter to his friend John Wheeler (1911-2008), a Princeton theoretical physicist. Wheeler said, “Extremely speculative? Bah!” Then he reminded Tegmark that some of the original papers on quantum mechanics were also considered extremely speculative. After Wheeler sent the journal his objection to their objection, Tegmark's paper was published. This paper of mine can also be seen as a "too speculative" extension of Werner Heisenberg's matrix version of quantum mechanics. In particular, the part equating the Mobius strip to a,b,c,d,e and being a relation of matrix mathematics – and the part which says Brouwer's Fixed Point Theorem shows the universe must be infinite and eternal (the universe may seem unrelated to the quantum world, but the former is composed of the latter and this article's cosmology is a direct outgrowth of matrix mechanics). What is the Dark Matter that holds together galaxies and galaxy clusters? Nobody knows. Some say it's gravitational, and requires modification of Einstein's General Relativity. Some say it's a form of matter, consisting of dark particles. Those ideas are combined here with 20th-century physicist Richard Feynman's interpretation of advanced and retarded waves. (Feynman found that adding the contributions of advanced and retarded waves creates a consistent quantum theory called QED - Quantum Electrodynamics - in which the terms that might violate causality cancel precisely.) I believe LIGO (the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory) will build on Richard Feynman's QED and his love of "advanced" waves that travel backwards in time. There should be several applications of this extension of QED: (1) Radioactive dating of dinosaur fossils, ancient rocks, and Earth itself should all result in readings that are many times less - at least a thousand (for dinosaurs), to nearly a million (for Earth). (2) Health might be dramatically improved and lifespan dramatically increased. (3) United with electronic binary digits, cosmic topology and mathematical Wick rotation; extra large-scale dimensions could be discovered - and these dimensions joined with matter and mass, space and time into one physical space-time unification. (4) Matter, antimatter and dark matter should become viewed as different aspects of one thing when combined with advanced waves, Wick rotation and the mathematical Matrix. (5) Maths like Brouwer's Fixed Point Theorem and so called "imaginary" time agree that space-time can be seen as one literally infinite and eternal "block" universe containing all the past as well as the entire future (the Cosmic Microwave Background and redshift objections are addressed). (6) The new maths in this article tells us that our present maths is incomplete within a unified universe, is therefore relied upon too much, and is incapable of producing a successful theory of Quantum Gravity (unification of quantum mechanics and Einstein's theory of gravity, general relativity). Paradoxically, "new maths" also says ∞= 0 (the infinity of the universe's size equals the zero-ness of space-time/gravity) and points to a new physics. Science seems to avoid infinity at all costs – equating it with zero will give scientists many more headaches. Maybe they could accept infinity if ∞= 0 was viewed as the ultimate form of renormalization – a renormalization that, thanks to E=mc2, doesn't reduce the infinite size of the universe but reduces the distances in space and between times to zero.

Comments: 23 Pages. Cite:

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2018-05-02 23:58:53
[v2] 2018-05-05 02:57:07
[v3] 2018-05-11 01:09:25

Unique-IP document downloads: 12 times is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus