**Authors:** Richard David Gill

Geometric algebra has been proposed as an alternative framework to the quantum mechanics of interacting qubits in a number of pioneering papers by Chris Doran, Anthony Lasenby and others, building on the foundations laid by David Hestenes. This line of work is summarised in two chapters of the book Doran and Lasenby (2003). Since then however, the approach has been pretty much completely neglected, with one exception: in 2007 Joy Christian published the first of a series of works, culminating in a book Christian (2014), which took off in a completely different direction: he claimed to have refuted Bell's theorem and to have obtained a local realistic model of the famous singlet correlations by taking account of the geometry of space, as expressed through geometric algebra. His geometric algebraic model of the singlet correlations is completely different from that of Doran and Lasenby. One of the aims of the present paper is to explore geometric algebra as a tool for quantum information and to explain why it did not live up to its early promise. The short answer is: because the mapping between 3D geometry and the mathematics of one qubit is already thoroughly understood, while the extension to a system of entangled qubits does not bring in new geometric insights but on the contrary merely reproduces the usual complex Hilbert space approach in a clumsy way. The tensor product of two Clifford algebras is not a Clifford algebra, the dimension is too large, an ad hoc fix is needed. We also work through the mathematical core of two of Christian's shortest, least technical, and most accessible works (Christian 2007, 2011), exposing both a conceptual and an algebraic error at their heart. This paper was originally written in 2015, did not pass arXiv moderation and was therefore self-published on viXra where it was object of heated debate. In the meantime, Joy Christian has published further very ambitious elaborations and extensions of his theory in the journal RSOS (Royal Society - Open Source), arXiv:1806.02392, and in the journal IEEE Access, arXiv:1405.2355. As far as I can see the new papers have very similar defects as the original ones, plus a lot more complexity and some new surprising and controversial elements. He has also put out a pure mathematical paper claiming a counter-example to Hurwitz's theorem that the only division algebras are R, C, H, O with dimensions 1, 2, 4, 8; arXiv:1806.02392.

**Comments:** 15 Pages. v5, minor correction to discussion of Hurwitz theorem

**Download:** **PDF**

[v1] 2015-04-14 00:32:12

[v2] 2015-05-18 08:09:15

[v3] 2019-10-16 03:48:14

[v4] 2019-10-21 09:10:12

[v5] 2019-10-23 22:36:27

**Unique-IP document downloads:** 325 times

Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

**Add your own feedback and questions here:**

*You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful. *