Authors: Kabir Adinoyi Umar
Using an interpretation of special relativity in the context of a rotating brane universe, it is shown that an asymptotically vanishing particle antiparticle asymmetry described by a cosmological factor Г can result such that 0 < Г < 1. We discus a cancellation scenario in which an asymptotically vanishing effective cosmological constant Λ arise from this asymmetry where virtual particles and antiparticles contribute attractive and repulsive terms respectively to the quantum vacuum. The asymmetry is fundamentally in the form of difference in speed limit c and for particles and antiparticles which in this scenario, exists as excitations of the opposite surfaces of a brane universe rotating along its time dimension. Using estimates from quantum field theory and the observed value of dark energy density, the cosmological factor is constrained to be ≈ 10-120 in the present universe. Observational constraint may also come from precision measurement of spatial curvature. Г ≈ 1 obtainable in the early universe would produce large effective cosmological constant (Λ ~ 1068 m-2) capable of driving inflation and possibly the baryon asymmetry of our universe.
Comments: 12 Pages. Based on a paper presentation titled: "vacuum relativitiy: the origin of the content of our universe" at the 34th annual conference of the Nigerian Institute of Physics on the 14th of October 2011 at Obafemi Awolowo University Ile-Ife.
[v1] 2012-02-14 09:17:10
Unique-IP document downloads: 103 times
Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.