| viXra.org > General Science and Philosophy > 2201 |
 |
 |
| viXra.org > General Science and Philosophy > 2201 |
|
|
[4] viXra:2201.0195 [pdf] submitted on 2022-01-27 09:20:32
Authors: Moninder Singh Modgil
Comments: 10 Pages.
This paper is written within the philosophical frame work of Brahma Kumaris World Spiritual University, located at Shantivan, Abu Road, Rajasthan, India. When one considers an Eternally Civilized, Time Cyclic Universe, one is lead to periodic changes in all physical system and their parameters – and in particular, the human brain - and its EEG. It is projected that the essentially dominant Beta activity in the present age - would be replaced by Delta activity in alert and conscious brains.
Category: General Science and Philosophy
[3] viXra:2201.0193 [pdf] submitted on 2022-01-27 13:17:30
Authors: Clark M. Thomas
Comments: 6 Pages.
In experimental science there are occasions where
elegant perfection is properly demanded, ideally
involving one variable. In much research practice
there are often parallel agendas involving anything
but good science: Critical science is either not done,
or done inadequately, because corrupted research
programs often focus on micro-measurable progress
within incorrect paradigms, instead of the whole
problem itself. Worst of all are studies designed to
reinforce previous paradigm errors.
Category: General Science and Philosophy
[2] viXra:2201.0112 [pdf] submitted on 2022-01-17 21:02:50
Authors: Lucian M Ionescu
Comments: 3 Pages.
The principle of equivalence implies the inertial mass equals to gravitational mass.
Gravity is understood in terms of the quark model, amended by Platonic symmetry.
This allows to comment on the origin of inertial mass and how it can be controlled when controlling gravity.
Category: General Science and Philosophy
[1] viXra:2201.0073 [pdf] submitted on 2022-01-13 12:38:50
Authors: Gabriel-Claudiu GRAMA
Comments: 18 Pages. CC BY-SA
Do Christians understand Christianity, or do they have faith? Can you destroy a religion by replacing understanding with faith? Using overwhelming objective arguments, we claim to have decoded and "unearthed" Christianity (and probably, if they exist, Christian-like religions too), introducing the authentic version of Christianity, explaining many of it's fundamental aspects. We even proved the compatibility between Christianity (creationist) and Darwinism, and proposed a shockingly eerie hypothesis for the question: "Why would God allow undeserved suffering?". The philosophy of life, with it's objective arguments, was hiding under our noses, disguised as something else.
Like gravity is only an illusion (according to Einstein's General Theory of Relativity), and like borders are social constructs, and like fiat money (which has no intrinsic value) is social construct, is corruption also only an illusion, and a social construct? We suggest that the answer is yes: corruption is (sometimes, partly) a (curable) social construct, that stems from misunderstandings, psychological defects (created by evolution), incentives, conflict of interest, and lack of trust, a social construct supported by inheritable things (sins) such as war, and antisocial systems. Occasionally we propose ideas to help combat and prevent both corruption and inheritance of sin.
For many years, I thought that I was an agnostic atheist, but now I know that the reason why I was agnostic, is because my God was literally the truth. If you exist, then that means other people like you also exist. Remember: freedom of expression and the truth are the most valuable things, however, the authorities might disagree with our version of freedom of expression.
This article has missing information, because "art is never finished, only abandoned" (Leonardo da Vinci), experts make mistakes, the author is brainwashed, so please do not believe everything that is written, in this article, just because you like or believe some or most things you found here (see cognitive biases: the halo effect, confirmation bias, frequency bias, and potentially others)! However, if you are not hated or quizzaciously ridiculed for the things you say, then you are not a good philosopher.
Category: General Science and Philosophy
| Third-Party Links: |
|