| viXra.org > General Science and Philosophy > 2007 |
 |
 |
| viXra.org > General Science and Philosophy > 2007 |
|
|
[6] viXra:2007.0198 [pdf] submitted on 2020-07-24 19:29:41
Authors: Muhammed Omar Badr
Comments: 1 Page.
In the holy Quran Babylon is written one time (in verse 2:102). As explained in the following paper it contains the dimensions of the Tower of Babylon.
Category: General Science and Philosophy
[5] viXra:2007.0157 [pdf] submitted on 2020-07-20 10:26:46
Authors: Muhammed Omar Badr
Comments: 3 Pages.
The purpose of this paper was the research whether there are hidden mathematical structures in the holy Quran, regarding the chapter- and verse numbers of the holy Quran. The chapter- and verse numbers were put in special orders to check them for mathematical similarities. The result is important because it shows that the chapter- and verse numbers in the holy Quran are not randomly distributed and chosen but have a special structure that was not found before and shows its divine origin. It is an easy to understand and to proof but hard to copy structure (without a computer that has not existed at the time of the revelation of the holy Quran). The structure will be described in the following text. The paper is interesting for mathematicians but also for the general reader.
Category: General Science and Philosophy
[4] viXra:2007.0123 [pdf] submitted on 2020-07-16 11:19:44
Authors: Vladimir Aksayskiy
Comments: 4 Pages.
There are at least two strategies: 1 - to look for reasonable ones, such as us, and 2 - to look for strangers who are sharply different from us in the type and speed of communication.
Category: General Science and Philosophy
[3] viXra:2007.0106 [pdf] submitted on 2020-07-15 06:43:32
Authors: Abhishek Majhi
Comments: 11 Pages. This work is neither completely philosophical, nor completely scientific, yet it can be useful to the reader if he/she can give meaning to it.
Do you believe that science is based on contradictions? Let me consider the common experience of seeing a dot of the pencil on a paper. If I call the dot ``zero length dimension'' or ``zero extension'', then certainly I have seen `nothing'. But, if I have seen `nothing', I wonder how I can refer to `nothing', let alone naming `nothing' as ``a point''. Therefore, the expression ``zero length dimension'' is a contradiction. Mathematical science, as of now, is based on this contradiction that results from the attitude of exactness, because exact ``zero'' is non-referable and inexpressible. Such attitude leads to incomplete statements like ``infinitesimal quantities'' which never mention ``with respect to'' what. Consequently, as I find, science becomes fraught with singularity. I avoid this contradiction, by accepting my inability to do exact science. Therefore, I consider the dot as of ``negligible length dimension''. It is a practical statement rather than a sacrosanct axiom. The practicality serves the purpose of drawing geometry, that becomes impossible if I decide or choose to look at the dot through a magnifying glass. It then answers a different practical question, namely, what the dot is made up of. Certainly, reality of the dot depends on how I choose or decide to observe it. This is the essence of ``relational existence''. On the contrary, modern mathematical science is founded upon belief of ``independent existence''(invariant). My belief in inexact mathematical science and relational existence needs the introduction of an undecidable length unit to do arithmetic and leads to non-singular gravity. Further, the quest for justification of my choice or decision leads to my incompleteness -- ``I''-- the undecidable premise beyond science, the expression of which is a (useful) contradiction in itself as ``I'' is inexpressible.
Category: General Science and Philosophy
[2] viXra:2007.0092 [pdf] submitted on 2020-07-13 16:00:58
Authors: Richard M. Smith
Comments: 1 Page.
A three-dimensional model of Mars is used to test the hypothesis that certain linear features on Mars are remanent shorelines.
Category: General Science and Philosophy
[1] viXra:2007.0070 [pdf] replaced on 2020-10-13 08:33:23
Authors: Vidamor Cabannas
Comments: 230 Pages. [Corrections are made by viXra Admin]
Este Comentário Número 9 à Teoria da Objetividade tem como objetivo demonstrar a quantidade de lados que compõem o ponto esférico que ocorria antes do surgimento do Universo e confirmar que não é possível a construção de uma esfera mínima, perfeita e lógica sem que ela seja composta na sua circunferência máxima por menos que sessenta e quatro lados retos. Em sequência, são demonstrados os desdobramentos da construção lógica dos elementos geométricos derivados da esfera perfeita, aferindo uma realidade espacial que supera as três dimensões convencionais da matemática humana, comprovando a existência de uma quarta dimensão espacial e uma quinta dimensão lógica para todo elemento geométrico. A Teoria da Objetividade é também denominada de “A Terceira Via” ou “A Terceira Teoria”, como referência de ser uma terceira explicação alternativa do surgimento do universo, diferente da Teoria do Big Bang e do Criacionismo.
Category: General Science and Philosophy
| Third-Party Links: |
|