[4] viXra:1003.0253 [pdf] submitted on 26 Mar 2010
Authors: Dainis Zeps
Comments: 12 pages
We consider idea of hierarchical multitime notion and of the cone of creation. Following
this idea, the time used in traditional sense is only a single projection of time in the
multitime. Multitime must have inner dimension upwards turning it into hierarchical
structure which acts as what we call global cone of creation. On our time projection,
evolution of species and BB, both global and local, in SM are examples of local cones
of creation. Higgs field as symmetry breaking accounts for complementary worlds on other
projections of time in multitime. We argue that time is form of referencing within
matter and doesn't have any sense without matter. These are the hypothetical assumptions
which may be tested, when LHC experiment shall go on.
Category: History and Philosophy of Physics
[3] viXra:1003.0215 [pdf] replaced on 6 Mar 2010
Authors: Titu Popescu
Comments: 100 pages, v1 in Romainian, V2 in English Translated by P. Georgelin, F. Smarandache, and L. Popescu
In the history of thought and creation, the decisive events, the great and significant
moments, the strongly affirmative stages - then the imposition of the optimizing novelties - have
depended on the name and prestige of a personality. Referring to those, we personalize further on.
The examples are extremely numerous, even in our nearest past. When we mention a creation - in
the largest sense of the term - with the name of the personality who illustrates it most extensively
at a given time, we state precisely the specific importance of it; we give it, with other words, the
identity to which we can refer continuously with full knowledge and without causing any
confusion among the receivers. The facts are called with the name of the man who produced
them, and in this way we can compose a parallel onomastic dictionary, in which the work is
included in the person's space, keeping its content. The consecrated proper names evolve through
quickly imposed habits, a large range of increments that announce the essential outline of their
peak production. No space for ambiguity remains when we address to readers or listeners who are
somewhat acquainted with the subject and we use such terms as Aristotelianism, Platonism,
Kantianism, Hegelianism, Proustianism, Eminescianism, Barbianism, etc. We have even the
advantage of a centered communication when we suggest with a sole notion the work as well as
its dominant features, linked with the renown of the concerned author.
Category: History and Philosophy of Physics
[2] viXra:1003.0052 [pdf] submitted on 6 Mar 2010
Authors: Florentin Smarandache
Comments: 2 pages
In the scientific research, it is important to keep our freedom of thinking and not being
yoked by others' theories without checking them, no matter where they come from.
Cogito, ergo sum (I think, therefore I am), said Descartes (1596-1650), and this Latin
aphorism became his first principle in philosophy.
Category: History and Philosophy of Physics
[1] viXra:1003.0008 [pdf] submitted on 5 Mar 2010
Authors: Dainis Zeps
Comments: 11 pages, submitted to JCER
Impact of quantum mechanics on physical science epistemology and science at all is
considered.
We consider methodolically idea that science doesn't research its assumed objects but the
ability to research, thus making itself not distinguishable from the cognitive science in the
most general sense. Next idea is that what we discover firstly are the methods and the
technologies understanding about which may come (if at all) much much later after we have
learned to use these technologies in our life up to incredible level.
Instrumentality rather than objectivity should be researched in science. In this sense quantum
mechanical impact on sciences should be assessed. Using this approach, quantum
consciousness should be quested for.
Category: History and Philosophy of Physics