## Once More on Potential vs. Actual Infinity

**Authors:** Felix M. Lev

The {\it technique} of classical mathematics involves only potential infinity, i.e. infinity is understood only as a limit. However, {\it the basis} of classical mathematics does involve actual infinity: the infinite ring of integers $Z$ is the starting point for constructing infinite sets with different cardinalities, and it is not even posed a problem whether $Z$ can be treated as a limit of finite sets. On the other hand, finite mathematics starts
from the ring $R_p=(0,1,...p-1)$ (where all operations are modulo $p$) and the theory contains only finite sets. We prove that $Z$ can be treated as a limit of $R_p$ when $p\to\infty$ and explain that, as a consequence, finite mathematics is more fundamental than
classical one.

**Comments:** 9 Pages.

**Download:** **PDF**

### Submission history

[v1] 2019-10-16 00:11:18

**Unique-IP document downloads:** 18 times

Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary.
In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution.
Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

**Add your own feedback and questions here:**

*You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.*

*
*