Statistics

   

A Fully Bayesian Solution to K-Sample Tests for Comparison and the Behrens-Fisher Problem Based on the Henstock-Kurzweil Integral

Authors: Fabrice J.P.R. Pautot

We present a simple, fully probabilistic, Bayesian solution to -sample omnibus tests for comparison, with the Behrens-Fisher problem as a special case, which is free from the many defects found in the standard, classical, frequentist, likelihoodist and Bayesian approaches to those problems. We solve the main measure-theoretic difficulty for degenerate problems with continuous parameters of interest and Lebesgue-negligible point null hypothesis by approximating the corresponding continuous random variables by sequences of discrete ones defined on partitions of the parameter spaces and by taking the limit of the prior-to-posterior ratios of the probability of the null hypothesis for the corresponding discrete problems. Those limits are well defined under proper technicalities thanks to the Henstock-Kurzweil integral that is as powerful as the Lebesgue integral but still relies on Riemann sums, which are essential in the present approach. The solutions to the relative continuous problems take the form of Bayes-Poincaré factors that are new objects in Bayesian probability theory and should play a key role in the general theory of point null hypothesis testing, including other important problems such as the Jeffreys-Lindley paradox.

Comments: 17 Pages.

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2019-09-17 06:56:34
[v2] 2019-09-24 07:16:46

Unique-IP document downloads: 13 times

Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus