Set Theory and Logic


Denial of Summers’ Malice and Alice as a Logical Puzzle

Authors: Colin James III

The clauses of the Malice and Alice logical puzzle of Summers are mapped for evaluation of the conjecture. It should return tautology for all pairwise answers, before removing pairs of the antecedent to discover the correct pair of murder and victim. However, the conjecture is not tautologous, albeit one value shy. This means the puzzle as rendered is not well formed, thereby denying the status of a puzzle. Therefore the conjecture is a non tautologous fragment of the universal logic VŁ4.

Comments: Pages.

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2019-04-05 23:10:51

Unique-IP document downloads: 25 times is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus