Set Theory and Logic


Refutation of Block Argumentation

Authors: Colin James III

We evaluate the approach of block argumentation using the legal example of a popular case. Three scenarios are not tautologous. We attempt to resuscitate the method by substitution of generic block argumentation and also by testing the consequent parts separately. The equations were not tautologous, hence refuting the block argumentation approach as presented.

Comments: 3 Pages. © Copyright 2019 by Colin James III All rights reserved. Respond to author by email only at: info@ersatz-systems dot com. See website . (We warn troll Mikko at Disqus to read the article four times before hormonal typing.)

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2019-01-21 10:35:28

Unique-IP document downloads: 13 times is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus