Authors: Colin James III
We evaluate the existential import of the Revised Modern Square of Opposition. We confirm that the Łukasiewicz syllogistic was intended to apply to all terms. What follows is that Aristotle was mistaken in his mapping of vertices, which we correct and show fidelity to Aristotle's intentions. We also evaluate the Cube of Opposition of Seuren. Two final claims are not tautologous, hence refuting the Cube, which also contradict criticism of Seuren that was not based on those claims.
Comments: 4 Pages. © Copyright 2016-2019 by Colin James III All rights reserved. Updated abstract at ersatz-systems.com . Respond to the author by email at: info@ersatz-systems dot com.
Unique-IP document downloads: 12 times
Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.