General Mathematics


Is This Euler's Mistake? or is it Just a Misprint Circling?

Authors: Toshiro Takami

Euler's formula is generally expressed as follows. \zeta(1-s)={\frac{2}{(2*pi)^s}\Gamma(s)\cos(\frac{pi*s}{2})\zeta(s))} However, I substitute (-2,-4,-6) in this and do not become zero. There is not it and approaches only for a zero when I surely substitute Non trivial zero point (0.5+14.1347i, 0.5+21.0220i) for this formula. It is either whether the formula of the Euler is wrong whether a misprint is sold as for this.  I am convinced misprints are circulating. I am convinced that it is sold It is make a mistake with cos, and to have printed sin. Suppose you replace cos with sin. \zeta(1-s)={\frac{2}{(2*pi)^s}\Gamma(s)\sin(\frac{pi*s}{2})\zeta(s))}

Comments: 7 Pages.

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2018-12-07 18:37:16
[v2] 2018-12-08 16:08:22 (removed)
[v3] 2018-12-09 13:58:06

Unique-IP document downloads: 35 times is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus