Education and Didactics


Refutation of "Some Thing" from "Non Thing"

Authors: Colin James III

A variable implies itself in p → p or ~p → ~p as "Thing implies thing" or "Non thing implies non thing" but not when mixed with its negation in ~p → p or p → ~p as "Non thing implies thing" or "Thing implies non thing". This means creation out of nothing "ex nihilo" is not supported in ~p → p as "Non thing implies thing", or by introducing modal operators in ~◇p → ◇p as "Not some thing implies some thing" equivalent to □~p → ◇p as "All non things imply some thing". What follows is that "ex nihilo" is not equivalent to "a nullo" and that "ex nihilo" is not synonymous with God and hence not an ontological proof of G

Comments: 2 Pages. © Copyright 2018 by Colin James III All rights reserved. Respond to the author by email at: info@ersatz-systems dot com.

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2018-11-21 08:59:22

Unique-IP document downloads: 14 times is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus