Set Theory and Logic


Refutation of Stit Logic (Sees to it That)

Authors: Colin James III

From four papers in the relevant literature for 2017-2018, 13 equations are not tautologous. For example, an equation claimed for necessitation as p>[]p is TNTN TNTN TNTN TNTN (not all T proof values). Hence Stit logic is refuted

Comments: 1 Page. Copyright © 2018 by Colin James III All rights reserved. Note that comments on Disqus are not forwarded or read, so respond to author's email address: info@cec-services dot com.

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2018-07-23 22:31:40

Unique-IP document downloads: 15 times is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus