The content of consciousness (cC) constitutes an essential part of human life and is at the very heart of the hard problem of consciousness. In science, the cC of a subject (e.g., study participant) has been examined indirectly by measuring the subject’s behavioral reports, bodily signs, or neural signals. However, these measures do not reflect the full spectrum of the subject’s cC, which hampers an in-depth investigation of the cC and its neural basis. In this paper, we propose a method to consciously experience and directly know the full spectrum of the cC of other individuals in scientific experiments. The degree of epistemic objectivity of a specific entity has been reasonably judged by relevant individuals who have the ability to judge how faithful the entity is to fact. The epistemic objectivity of the entity is directly proportional to the number of relevant individuals who judge the entity as fact. Thus, even knowledge about a specific cC would be epistemically objective if multiple relevant individuals judged it as fact (i.e., as being true). We propose a method, called “CHANging Consciousness Epistemically” (“CHANCE”), to change the knowledge about a cC from being epistemically subjective to epistemically objective. The CHANCE method comprises two empirical steps: (1) identifying the minimally sufficient, content knowledge-specific neural correlates of consciousness (msckNCC) and (2) reproducing a specific msckNCC in different brains.
Comments: 13 Pages.
Unique-IP document downloads: 134 times
Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.