Authors: Bishnu Charan Behera
THIS IS A ALGORITHM WHICH HAS THE SAME TIME COMPLEXITY AS THAT OF LINEAR SEARCH OF O(n).BUT STILL IT IS BETTER THAN LINEAR SEARCH IN TERMS OF EXECUTION TIME. LET A[ ] BE THE THE ARRAY OF SOME SIZE N. IF THE ELEMENT WHICH WE WANT TO SEARCH IS AT ANY POSITION BEFORE N/2 THAN MY-SEARCH AND LINEAR-SEARCH BOTH WILL HAVE EXECUTION TIME , BUT THE MAGIC HAAPENS WHEN THE SEARCH ELEMENT IS AFTER N/2 POSITION.SUPPOSE THE ELEMENT WANT TO SEARCH IS AT Nth POSITION, THEN USING THE LINEAR SEARCH WILL FIND THE ELEMENT AFTER Nth ITERATION,BUT USING MY-SEARCH WE CAN SEARCH THE ELEMENT AFTER 1st ITERATION ITESELF. WHEN WE ARE DEALING WITH A SITUTATION WHEN SIZE IS SOMETHING 10 OR 15 ITS OK. BUT CAN YOU IMAGINE THE CASE WHEN THE SIZE IS “100000000” OR EQUIVALANENT.IF WE USE THIS LINEAR SEARCH TECHINIUQE THAN THE TOTAL EXPENDITURE YOU CAN THINK OFF TO CONTINUE THE LOOP FOR 100000000 TIMES.BUT RATHER IF USE MY-SEARCH U GET THE DESIRED SEARCH JUST AFTER 1 ITERATIONS. SO ,NOW YOU CAN IMAGINE HOW WE CAN PREVENT SUCH A BIG LOSS THROUGH MY-SEARCH. THANK YOU
Comments: 2 Pages.
[v1] 2015-04-17 08:19:42
Unique-IP document downloads: 95 times
Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.