Authors: Dongchan Lee
The USL pilot study series were created to dispel the doubts of its too-good-to-be-true claims. The previous off-line USL pilot study results imply that it is possible to boost the math skill average of a region (city, state, or even a country) by 1 year within a few weeks. If done simultaneously online, this can happen within a few days, which most people have been in total disbelief in spite of all the evidences and video testimonials and support videos of over 700 students, teachers and principals. This paper is to propose to various city, state, or national governments to participate in a series of scaled-down version of the previous USL pilot studies. We propose the USL 1.0, 0.5, and 0.25 each of which corresponds to quickly boost the regional math – proportionally speaking as the sample sizes will be limited - by 2 years (for the national governments only), 1 year (for the national or state governments) or ½ year (for the state or city governments) respectively. At the end, we propose to create Boards of Social Enterprises together where the USL team and the participating governments share the growths of the future Social Enterprises if the governments choose to do so as the implications out of even USL 0.25 (boosting the average math skill levels by half a year) or USL 0.5 (boosting the average math skill levels by half a year) are profound because it takes usually a few decades to improve the average math skill levels of a nation by 1/2 year in the history of OECD countries and rarely they boosted 1 year of math skills.
Comments: 5 Pages.
[v1] 2015-01-14 20:14:55
Unique-IP document downloads: 33 times
Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.