Authors: Rodney Bartlett
These are 6 short “Snacks for the Mind” combined with excerpts from “Intergalactic Plus Time Travel; Hyperspace and Space-Time’s Nature”, “Tomorrow’s Science Today”, “A New Earth And A New Universe”, etc. I’ve changed sentences here and there in the last 4, in an attempt to express my main thoughts (they were all very brief at first but #5 has become lengthy and #6 has had a long PS/PPS added to it – the PS talks about immortality while the PPS talks about Infinity, ESP, God and Satan the Devil). The first 2 are things I’ve been thinking about during the last week or two. Snack #1 - Cancer cells are incredibly difficult to eradicate completely. So let's take a lesson from the martial arts and use their own strength against them. Let them live - but only after they've been bioengineered to mutate back into healthy, functional cells and tissues that reproduce at a normal rate. Snack #2 - Can radio telescopes and infrared telescopes be adapted to allow amateur astronomers to view celestial phenomena through clouds and rain? Snack #3 - Reconciling the Dark Flow with the Poincare conjecture and Figure-8 Klein bottles to reinterpret parallel universes, cosmic strings and wormholes. Snack #4 - Cosmic-Quantum Unification and Einstein being centuries ahead of his time + Intergalactic and Time Travel Snack #5 - MOND (Modified Newtonian Dynamics) that fits in your pocket or purse; De=Hv+G (Dark Energy = Hidden Variables + Gravitation) Snack #6 - God's existence proven by combining the inverse-square law with quantum entanglement! This Physics of the Impossible means evolution is not the Origin of Species - origin is due to a suprapantheistic unity of spacetime's spatial, temporal, hyperspatial, material, personality and mental parts; forming a union with humans in a cosmic unification (we know this as God). But "evolution" is still responsible for changes (adaptations) within species.
Comments: 9 Pages.
[v1] 2012-11-20 22:29:47
Unique-IP document downloads: 37 times
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.