Authors: Andrei P. Kirilyuk
The existence of the omnipresent Higgs field providing the fundamental origin of elementary particle mass is the main theoretical concept behind the ongoing large-scale experiments at the LHC accelerator. We critically reconsider the properties of this concept of mass noting that many fundamental deficiencies and hard problems it contains leave serious doubts about this interpretation, without feasible progress in view. We then present another, dynamic and universal concept of mass avoiding these problems and thus opening a competitive new possibility for LHC result interpretation. It is based on the unreduced, nonperturbative solution to (arbitrary) many-body interaction problem providing the universal origin of relativistic inertial and gravitational mass in the form of emerging complex (chaotic) dynamics within the properly specified elementary field-particle, thus rigorously completing the double-solution ideas of Louis de Broglie. As practically all other old "mysteries" and new problems of fundamental physics are also naturally resolved within this unified complex-dynamical solution due to its essential mathematical novelty and provable completeness, we propose to consider it as a viable alternative in interpretation of LHC and other high-energy facilities results.
Comments: 34 pages, 28 eqs, 56 refs; minor corrections in the last version; Journal-ref: Nanosystems, Nanomaterials, Nanotechnologies 11(2) (2013) 217-248
Unique-IP document downloads: 133 times
Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.