Authors: Joel M Williams
A useful periodic table of the elements provides a number of important facts for its user: valence, metallic vs non-metallic compound formation and atomic weight being some of the more valuable. The current popular version has proven quite adequate in this regard for many chemists. A stubborn adherence to the stoic spdf-quantum-theory model, however, creates problems. Thus, this perspective requires that H be placed over Li and/or F even though it has little or no chemical similarity to either of them. This view of the electron structure of atoms also requires a number of “rules” and “hybridizations” to explain even the simplest aspects surrounding the electron structure and chemical bonding; mathematical orthogonality between periodic levels is a sham; and increasingly weirder shaped orbitals are needed to make the math fit the stoic spdf model. Transition and rare-earth/lanthanide series appear without physical rationale. In light of all these spdf-associated problems, the arrangement and behavior of the elements in the periodic table is addressed in this document according to the dynamic MCAS electron orbital model.
Comments: 4 Pages. This document was accepted for inclusion in the 3rd International Conference on the Periodic table held August 14-16, 2012 in Cusco, Peru.
[v1] 2012-08-16 18:50:12
Unique-IP document downloads: 359 times
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.