## Definition à la Bourbaki of the Basic Notions of Category Theory

**Authors:** Pierre-Yves Gaillard

We unsuccessfully try to give definitions in the spirit of Bourbaki's set theory for the basic notions of category theory. The goal is to avoid using either Grothendieck's universes axiom, or "classes" (or "collections") of sets which are not sets. We explain why our attempt fails.

**Comments:** 3 Pages.

**Download:** **PDF**

### Submission history

[v1] 2012-07-03 22:07:09

[v2] 2012-07-07 01:06:47

[v3] 2012-07-09 00:35:18

**Unique-IP document downloads:** 201 times

**Add your own feedback and questions here:**

*You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.*

*
*