Set Theory and Logic


Definition à la Bourbaki of the Basic Notions of Category Theory

Authors: Pierre-Yves Gaillard

We unsuccessfully try to give definitions in the spirit of Bourbaki's set theory for the basic notions of category theory. The goal is to avoid using either Grothendieck's universes axiom, or "classes" (or "collections") of sets which are not sets. We explain why our attempt fails.

Comments: 3 Pages.

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2012-07-03 22:07:09
[v2] 2012-07-07 01:06:47
[v3] 2012-07-09 00:35:18

Unique-IP document downloads: 248 times is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus