General Science and Philosophy


Neutrosophic Interpretation of the Analects of Confucius 弗羅仁汀·司馬仁達齊,傅昱華 論語的中智學解讀和擴充 —正反及中智論語 English-Chinese Bilingual(英汉双语)

Authors: Florentin Smarandache, Fu Yuhua

This book is the companion volume of "Neutrosophic Interpretation of Tao Te Ching,” its purpose is to extend the foundation and application range of “The Analects of Confucius.” The reasons for this are as follows. Firstly, we are willing to point out that The Analects of Confucius already has some limitations, because many questions we are interested in cannot be answered within “The Analects of Confucius.” For example, The Analects of Confucius basically discussed the matters in China, however considering all possible situations it should matter in foreign countries as well, i.e. the “global village.” This was impossible in Confucian time. Secondly, if the original The Analects of Confucius is regarded as “The Positive Analects of Confucius,” its opposite would be “The Negative Analects of Confucius,” while the intermediate or compound state is “The Neutral Analects of Confucius” or “The Neutrosophic Analects of Confucius.” Thus, our book presents the way to extend the original The Analects of Confucius in various neutrosophic interpretations. 本書是《道德經的中智學解讀和擴充—正反及中智道德經》的姊妹篇,其目的是試圖 從形式和內容上對《論語》進行求新、求變、求擴充的工作。首先我們願意指出,由於時 代的限制,《論語》具有很大的局限性,當代人感興趣的很多問題,在《論語》中根本不可 能涉及。舉例來說,《論語》討論的基本上都是中國的事情,然而考慮一切可能的情況,在 研究某些問題時,不但要考慮中國的事情,而且要考慮外國的事情,亦即考慮資訊網路時 代“地球村”的事情,這在孔子年代是不可能的。其次,如果將原有的“論語”視為“正 論語”,其對立面就是“反論語”,而處於中間或複合狀態的就是 “中性論語”(或“中智 論語”)。本書給出了對於原有的《論語》用中智學方法進行解讀和實施千變萬化的途徑, 使其可以在相當大的範圍內擴充。

Comments: 268 Pages.

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2012-01-16 10:19:04

Unique-IP document downloads: 211 times is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus