Black Hole Horizon Curvature Dependent Balance Between Plasma Creation and e-e+ Annihilation in Quantum FFF Theory.

Authors: Leo Vuyk

In particle physics it is an interesting challenge to postulate that the FORM and structure of elementary particles is the origin of different FUNCTIONS of these particles. In former papers we presented possible solutions based on complex 3-D ring shaped particles, which are equipped with three point like hinges and one splitting point, all four points divided equally over the ring surface. The 3-D ring itself is postulated to represent the "Virgin Mother" of all other particles and is coined Higgs particle, supplied with the 3-hinges coded (OOO), which gives the particle the opportunity to transform after some sort of mechanical collision with other particles into a different shape, with a different function. Thus in the (Q-FFF) Quantum Function Follows Form theory, the Higgs is interpreted as a massless transformer particle able to create the universe by transformation of its shape after real mechanical collision and merge with other shaped particles into complex and compound knots like Quarks. The best place to create such plasma out of the "nothingness" of the Higgs vacuum seems to be not only direct after the Black hole splitting big bang, but even more at the event horizon of new paradigm black holes. However the balance between e- e+ annihilation and plasma creation seems to depend on the curvature of the black hole event horizon or better the size of the black hole. Smaller black holes have stronger horizon curvature related to the vacuum Higgs vacuum structure (or Planck scale) and as a result a better balance between Quark production and e-e+ annihilation. The Tarantula- and Eagle nebula seem to show us this difference.

Comments: 39 pages

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 15 Nov 2011

Unique-IP document downloads: 454 times is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus