Authors: Nigel B. Cook
British mathematician Sir Geoffrey I. Taylor in secret work for British civil defence in 1941 (declassified in 1950 and published in the Proceedings of the Royal Society, vol. 201A, pp. 159-186), derived the strong shock solution equation, namely distance, (equation) , where (equation) is the ambient (pre-shock) atmospheric density, t is time after explosion, E is the energy released and Sg is Taylor's calculated function of g, requiring a complex step-wise numerical integration. We present a proof of the equation (equation), implying that Taylor's so-called constant (equation), not requiring any complex integration. This is useful for close-in shock waves from nuclear explosions and supernovae explosions. We further obtain the general arrival time of the shock wave (equation), by noting two asymptotic solutions; namely, at very great distances, the blast decays into a sound wave so the arrival time t approaches the ratio of distance to sound velocity (equation), while at very close-in distances the strong shock equation previously derived becomes accurate, and there is also an easily included effect at intermediate distances due to the expansion of the hot air in reducing shock front arrival times. The errors of method made by Taylor for nuclear test explosions in air were also made by Russian mathematician Leonid I. Sedov who applied similar cumbersome numerical integrations in a 1946 paper (published in the Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, vol. 10, pp. 241-50).
Comments: 3 pages, see paper for equations in abstract
[v1] 28 Mar 2010
Unique-IP document downloads: 1435 times
Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.