## Unambiguous Quantization from the Maximum Classical Correspondence that is Self-Consistent: the Slightly Stronger Canonical Commutation Rule Dirac Missed

**Authors:** Steven Kenneth Kauffmann

Dirac's identification of the quantum analog of the Poisson bracket with the commutator is reviewed, as
is the threat of self-inconsistent overdetermination of the quantization of classical dynamical variables which
drove him to restrict the assumption of correspondence between quantum and classical Poisson brackets
to embrace only the Cartesian components of the phase space vector. Dirac's canonical commutation rule
fails to determine the order of noncommuting factors within quantized classical dynamical variables, but
does imply the quantum/classical correspondence of Poisson brackets between any linear function of phase
space and the sum of an arbitrary function of only configuration space with one of only momentum space.
Since every linear function of phase space is itself such a sum, it is worth checking whether the assumption
of quantum/classical correspondence of Poisson brackets for all such sums is still self-consistent. Not
only is that so, but this slightly stronger canonical commutation rule also unambiguously determines the
order of noncommuting factors within quantized dynamical variables in accord with the 1925 Born-Jordan
quantization surmise, thus replicating the results of the Hamiltonian path integral, a fact first realized by
E. H. Kerner. Born-Jordan quantization validates the generalized Ehrenfest theorem, but has no inverse,
which disallows the disturbing features of the poorly physically motivated invertible Weyl quantization,
i.e., its unique deterministic classical "shadow world" which can manifest negative densities in phase space.

**Comments:** 11 pages, Final publication in Foundations of Physics; available online at
http://www.springerlink.com/content/k827666834140322/

**Download:** **PDF**

### Submission history

[v1] 2 Dec 2009

[v2] 7 Sep 2010

[v3] 15 Mar 2011

**Unique-IP document downloads:** 156 times

**Add your own feedback and questions here:**

*You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.*

*
*