[24] **viXra:1307.0136 [pdf]**
*submitted on 2013-07-26 00:33:11*

**Authors:** Manfred Buth

**Comments:** 4 Pages.

It is claimed that a closer investigation will reveal (a) that second quantization is a nightmare and (b) that the curvature of general relativity only is a 'trick' in order to circumvent the dealing with interaction. Hence it is proposed to leave the attempts of quantizing gravity and instead to develop a gauge theory of gravitation in accordance with the other gauge theories of the standard model. The rest of the paper can be considered as a first step in this direction.

**Category:** Relativity and Cosmology

[23] **viXra:1307.0130 [pdf]**
*submitted on 2013-07-25 01:33:37*

**Authors:** U.V.S.Seshavatharam, S.Lakshminarayana

**Comments:** 2 Pages. Open letter to the science community

In this letter an attempt is made to emphasize the major short comings of modern or standard cosmology

**Category:** Relativity and Cosmology

[22] **viXra:1307.0128 [pdf]**
*submitted on 2013-07-24 09:50:55*

**Authors:** Khrapko R

**Comments:** 4 Pages. A translation from Russian http://www.mai.ru/science/trudy/articles/num18/article6/auther.htm (2005)

Roche’s paper “What is mass” advocates a historical predecessor of mass. It impedes teaching because presses on inadequate concept of mass.

**Category:** Relativity and Cosmology

[21] **viXra:1307.0125 [pdf]**
*replaced on 2013-07-26 03:48:52*

**Authors:** Radwan M. Kassir

**Comments:** 10 pages, 6 figures, PDFLaTeX―[v2]: Added discussions to S.4.0

The implication of the Fitzgerald length contraction hypothesis on the time dimension is considered. Originally set as an ad hoc interpretation of the Michelson-Morley experiment null result, the hypothesis is expressed in terms of a space transformation equation inferred from the Galilean transformation, leading to a time conversion exhibiting a contractive property.

**Category:** Relativity and Cosmology

[20] **viXra:1307.0093 [pdf]**
*submitted on 2013-07-19 02:37:10*

**Authors:** S.V. Akimenko, V.V. Demjanov

**Comments:** 5 Pages. 5 Engl.+5 Russ. version

In the article was found a second solution of the problem about the force acting on a point-like particle moving in a time-dependent potential field, is mathematically equal with early known solution. Is considered the question of the possibility of interpreting of this force, how of force of gravitational field from externals of inert a bodies (in the spirit of Mach's hypothesis about the external induction of the inertial of mass of point-like particles). Here formulated by experimental problem of identifying in studies for the celestial mechanics of this small additional of gravitational of force, which may be are achieved by the use of modern radio-physical of methods.

**Category:** Relativity and Cosmology

[19] **viXra:1307.0090 [pdf]**
*replaced on 2014-03-13 18:02:23*

**Authors:** Gene H Barbee

**Comments:** 36 Pages.

Historically, a culture’s cosmology was an explanation of the origin and a justification for its most significant beliefs. This paper is a summary of work by the author building on the best measurements made by physicists, astronomers and cosmologists. Scientists are actively engaged in understanding new observations regarding our universe. There is agreement that achieving a new level of understanding may require an extension to what has been observed to date about fundamental interactions, matter and energy. Of specific interest are the topics of force unification, gravitational theory, definition of space and time, dark energy and cold dark mass. Of course these are technical matters but the author addresses what this means to life and what it is reasonable to believe regarding philosophy’s “enduring questions”. The following documents are summarized:
A Top-Down Approach to Fundamental Interactions [1]
Starting with data from WMAP [11] that allows an estimate of the number of protons in the universe (exp(180), where exp stands for natural number 2.712^180) the author explored how this number is used by nature to represent fundamental particles. This reference described models for the neutron and proton mass based on Shannon type information theory. In addition, it proposed a way of unifying the electromagnetic, weak, strong and gravitational forces.
A Simple Model of Atomic Binding Energy [20]
The purpose of this document is to support the value 10.15 mev from the proton mass model. This is the value that changes and causes the atomic binding energy curve [9]. The model presented is a probabilistic model that follows the same fundamentals of reference 1.
Semi-Fundamental Abundance of the Elements [19]
This document again is offered as support for the proton mass model and the model of atomic binding energy. It provides a probabilistic model of fusion using barrier energy from the binding energy curve model. It models the abundance of the elements produced during the life cycle of stars [8][10].
The case for a Low Energy Gravitational Scale [18]
This document summarizes arguments for a low energy gravitational scale and offered an understanding of the weak and long range character of gravitation. Physics has struggled with the reconciliation of general relativity with the other fundamental interactions (strong force, weak force and electromagnetic force). The reason for the difficulty is that general relativity and gravitation is the geometry of space and time and does not appear to originate at a reasonable energy at the quantum level. The accepted gravitational theory had the energy scale far above the energy of a proton. The author proposed a lower energy scale and offered a relationship between the quantum scale and the scale of the universe that appears to resolve this conflict.
Kinetic and Potential Energy during Expansion [2]
This document summarizes and extends this theoretical groundwork to the field of cosmology.
Information from the proton mass model is applied to the beginning, expansion of the universe and observables from the field of astronomy. The fundamentals of space and time are described including the relationships that accurately model expansion, temperature, gravitational history and helium abundance. Results from an expansion model are compared to values reported in WMAP analysis and CMAGIC studies [14]. Three models of expansion are compared and a proposal regarding dark matter is discussed. Reference 2 analyzed the kinetic and potential energy changes during expansion and showed that there is no dark energy (dark energy fraction is 0). Furthermore, information is presented that questions the WMAP conclusion that only 0.046 of the universe is normal protons. Based on this document, it appears that the baryon (proton) fraction is 0.5 and the cold dark matter fraction is 0.5.
Baryon and Meson Masses Based on Natural Frequency Components [3]
The purpose of this document is to extend the approach used to develop the proton mass model to data gathered for the hundreds of mesons and baryons observed at high energy labs [7]. Although the work is somewhat tentative most of the particles have “mirror” particles that allow nature to balance properties to zero (particles with properties can be created from zero only if there is a “mirror” particle). This supports the author’s view that one-half of the mass in the universe is protons and the other half is cold dark matter.
Life from Information [4]
Based on reference 1, it appears that the universe’s components are made out of information. Life is of course made out of the same components but they fit together in an uncanny way. The author studied how the eye senses four light frequencies and interprets them as color vision. It is not unreasonable to think that the other senses are similar and that the brain is a great integrator and manipulator of information.
Camp Four [21]
Science is climbing and the author anticipates what the view might be as we summit. This FQXi essay theorizes that information based reality is central to our existence. Our physical nature is complementary but the mind’s ability to create information appears to be fundamental to nature. We do not know why nature chose to use the number exp(180) to create everything but the components fit together and we observe the result. It is not unreasonable to believe that information operations that created nature are very much like our mind’s ability to create information.

**Category:** Relativity and Cosmology

[18] **viXra:1307.0089 [pdf]**
*replaced on 2014-03-27 08:53:38*

**Authors:** Gene H Barbee

**Comments:** 19 Pages. contact genebarbee@msn.com

The Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe WMAP [3][7] and similar projects led to expansion curves and cosmological parameters that are becoming generally accepted. The author developed expansion equations that agree with WMAP but are thought to be more fundamental. A unique cellular approach is used that allows the kinetic energy and potential energy to be calculated. There are two components of expansion. The second component develops later and according to new calculations requires negligible kinetic energy. The concept of critical density (H= (8/3 pi G rhoC)^.5) incorrectly assumes that density characterizes kinetic energy for this component. Critical density (omega total=1) according to year 9 WMAP parameters [7] is composed of fractions: omega dark=0.718, omega mass=0.235 and omega baryonic mass=0.046. One goal of this paper is to reanalyze mass components with the new understanding that omega dark may be negligible. Based on a model of the proton [1], the author uses 9.8 MeV as the kinetic energy (KE) of expansion and it appears to be adequate to expand one half of the mass to 6.22e25 meters. This is further evidence that mass components might have been misidentified. There is strong support for protons being only a small fraction of omega total. The ratio baryon number/photon number must be about 6e-10 to agree with primordial nucleosynthesis. The photon number is based on CMB temperature 2.725 K and the ratio does not allow a high proton fraction. However, the author believes that there is another energy source that must be considered. Neutrons decay with a half-life of 886 seconds releasing 1.29 MeV of neutrinos and the electron. Based on this the photon plus neutrino kinetic energy gives a photon density 2.7 time higher. This higher density allows higher baryon density while maintaining the important 6e-10 baryon/photon ratio. It is also consistent with 0.5*exp(180) protons/m^3 indicating that one half of the mass is protons.
Other topics addressed are: equality and decoupling, temperature curves for He4 fusion and neutron decay, CMB spot temperature and cold dark matter.

**Category:** Relativity and Cosmology

[17] **viXra:1307.0085 [pdf]**
*replaced on 2014-03-11 13:03:28*

**Authors:** Gene H Barbee

**Comments:** 18 Pages. contact genebarbee@msn.com with comments

Gravity is known to be the geometry of space time (general theory of relativity). It is generally accepted that the source of the gravitational constant (G) is the Planck scale. The fundamental relationship gives the Compton wavelength (for gravity the Planck length L), L=(\h*G/C^3)^.5 as a function of the reduced Planck or Heisenberg constant (\h pronounced hbar), G and C the speed of light. The Compton wavelength is 1.61e-35 meters and this is associated with the Planck energy 1.2e22 mev. This energy scale is far greater than the energy of a proton and the space surrounding each proton is far greater than the Compton wavelength. Literature states that the Compton wavelength is nature’s response to geometry and mass at the quantum scale. The Planck scale causes difficulties including infinities and quantum foam like space.
This paper reviews a hierarchy of interactions with a focus on gravity. A low energy scale source of the gravitational constant is proposed and a more fundamental coupling constant with the value 1/exp(90) is identified (where exp(90) stands for the natural number e to the power 90). The proposed field energy is 2.683 mev and is associated with a radius of 7.34e-14 meters.
The author uses a cellular approach to model expansion [3]. WMAP data [5] allows an estimation of the number of protons in the universe. A cell is the space associated with each proton and has cosmological properties that allow it to represent the universe geometrically. Each cell has an initial radius of 7.34e-14 meters and if it expands according to WMAP history its current value is 0.46 meters. Using this approach is was possible to compare the kinetic energy that expands cells with potential energy. Implications for the field of cosmology are discussed. Several examples involving the use of the factor 1/exp(90) are presented that demonstrate how cellular values predict large scale observations.
General relativity is the geometry of space time and special relativity describes how fixed laws appear to different observers when time is correctly identified as an equal fourth dimension. Schwarzschild equations include a prediction of time dilation that curves space time (delta time). These equations are known to be solutions in general relativity. Calculations using the factor exp(90) indicates that time dilation is equal for special and general relativity throughout expansion.

**Category:** Relativity and Cosmology

[16] **viXra:1307.0082 [pdf]**
*replaced on 2014-02-25 17:11:05*

**Authors:** Gene H Barbee

**Comments:** 19 Pages. genebarbee@msn.com

Accurate estimates regarding the number of neutrons in the universe are now available due to the WMAP [8] project. The author noted that there are approximately the natural number e (2.71828) to the power 180 (exp(N)) protons in the universe (Technical endnote 1) and explored the possibility that the number is fundamental to physics. Probabilities similar to the field of information theory developed by Claude Shannon [16] and others were used as tools to develop an information based approach to energy components in nature. Considering the probability of one neutron as 1/exp(180) a “top-down” model lead to a uniform method of evaluating fundamental forces. Once basic particle energies were identified a model of the neutron and proton was developed that lead to information that appears to underlie fundamental interactions. A cosmology model the author describes as the “many small cells model” defines cells associated with protons that geometrically combine into what has been described in literature as “the universe”. The relationship between large scale space and cells indicates that a small factor equal to 1/exp(90) is actually the gravitational coupling constant. A key field energy (2.683 mev) extracted from the proton model is associated with the radius 7.35e-14 meters. The source of gravity is thought to be the inertial force mv^2/r*(1/exp(90)) on a proton of mass 1.67e-27 kg where r is the above radius and v is associated with a kinetic energy of 9.7 mev (v/C=0.143). If this is the source of gravity, its energy scale is much lower than the Planck scale energy 1.2e22 mev and could reconcile general relativity with the Standard Model. It could also shed new light on space and time. A “Force Table” is presented for the hierarchy of interactions sourced from the proton model and comparisons to published data are carried out.

**Category:** Relativity and Cosmology

[15] **viXra:1307.0077 [pdf]**
*submitted on 2013-07-17 04:34:16*

**Authors:** S.Kalimuthu

**Comments:** 6 Pages. This is a new concept.

According to the predictions of Einstein’s general relativity theory, time and space were created only at the big bang. Albert Einstein concluded in his later years that the past, present, and future all exist simultaneously. But according to Hindu philosophical cosmology, space and time are eternal. Modern physics is also exploring pre – big bang era. In this work, the author attempts to show that the present time contains both future and past time.

**Category:** Relativity and Cosmology

[14] **viXra:1307.0071 [pdf]**
*replaced on 2013-10-21 12:23:52*

**Authors:** Fredrick W. Cotton

**Comments:** 8 Pages.

The electromagnetic constitutive tensor can be used to introduce a classical form of spin. For charged particles at rest, with no external forces, the spin does not affect the energy density of the particle. The particle solutions satisfy a non-Riemannian form of the Einstein-Maxwell equations.

**Category:** Relativity and Cosmology

[13] **viXra:1307.0070 [pdf]**
*submitted on 2013-07-15 16:32:35*

**Authors:** Fernando Loup

**Comments:** 40 Pages.

Warp Drives are solutions of the Einstein Field Equations that
allows superluminal travel within the framework of General
Relativity. There are at the present moment two known solutions:
The Alcubierre warp drive discovered in $1994$ and the Natario
warp drive discovered in $2001$. However as stated by both
Alcubierre and Natario themselves the warp drive violates all the
known energy conditions because the stress energy momentum tensor
is negative implying in a negative energy density. While from a
classical point of view the negative energy is forbidden the
Quantum Field Theory allows the existence of very small amounts of
it being the Casimir effect a good example as stated by Alcubierre
himself.The major drawback concerning negative energies for the
warp drive is the huge amount of negative energy able to sustain
the warp bubble.Ford and Pfenning computed the amount of negative
energy needed to maintain an Alcubierre warp drive and they
arrived at the result of $10$ times the mass of the entire
Universe for a stable warp drive configuration rendering the warp
drive impossible.However Harold White manipulating the parameter
$@$ in the original shape function that defines the Alcubierre
spacetime demonstrated that it is possible to low these energy
density requirements.We repeat here the Harold White analysis for
the Natario spacetime and we arrive at similar conclusions.From
$10$ times the mass of the Universe we also manipulated the
parameter $@$ in the original shape function that defines the
Natario spacetime and we arrived at arbitrary low results.We
demonstrate in this work that both Alcubierre and Natario warp
drives have two warped regions and not only one.We also discuss
Horizons and Doppler Blueshifts.The main reason of this work is to
demonstrate that Harold White point of view is entirely correct.

**Category:** Relativity and Cosmology

[12] **viXra:1307.0069 [pdf]**
*submitted on 2013-07-15 20:21:08*

**Authors:** Sony Fermino dos Santos

**Comments:** 3 Pages.

The behavior of the electrons in crystals exhibits some properties well known from solid state physics, like an upper limit for the particle velocity and an effective mass, which goes to the infinity as the particle velocity goes to that limit. This reminds us the relativistic mass. Indeed, both effective and relativistic masses have the same dependence on the velocity. The result is applicable to a general lattice – quantized space could be one –, which suggests that special relativity can be a consequence of a quantized spacetime. Even that is not the case, a similar approach could be used in the search for the Quantum Gravity.

**Category:** Relativity and Cosmology

[11] **viXra:1307.0064 [pdf]**
*submitted on 2013-07-13 20:00:23*

**Authors:** John Shim

**Comments:** 3 Pages.

This is a brief, informal discussion of what I see as the key problems of Special Relativity, many aspects of which have been touched directly or tangentially, arrived at by different paths and partly expressed in numerous papers on this forum and in other criticisms of it. I provide no formal justification for my views, other than what I have given in other papers on this forum. My purpose is rather to get at what I see as the essence of Einstein’s mistakes, as well as the physical behavior that Special Relativity, ironically, to some extent uncovers, but at the same time completely misrepresents. It seems to me that the question of the more correct nature of this underlying physics is the issue that both critics and defenders of Special Relativity must ultimately face. Einstein’s errors are too numerous and egregious, in my view, to remain much longer generally denied. But until they are recognized, no truer understanding of the underlying physics can be achieved

**Category:** Relativity and Cosmology

[10] **viXra:1307.0056 [pdf]**
*submitted on 2013-07-11 11:08:34*

**Authors:** Thomas Neil Neubert

**Comments:** 25 Pages.

This Toy Universe is constructed from geometry, force, dimension, particle and such. Of necessity, it steals liberally from the standard theories of physics. It would be impossible to build a somewhat credible Toy Universe from scratch. This Toy Universe is conceptually sufficient to accommodate many ideas from the standard theories of physics; but ultimately it is an incomplete and an incorrect metatheory. Nevertheless, it gives physical insight into how a more complete metatheory of our universe might be built; and why such an explicit metatheory is desirable.
The current Standard Model of Cosmology has an implicit metatheory. We will not try to explicate that standard metatheory; such a task would be too contentious. Our intent is to sketch this Toy Universe, as a metatheory, that can be built one descriptive Axiom at a time; and held in one’s mind.
Hopefully, this Toy Universe will stimulate discussion on why and how to construct metatheories. As well, this Toy Universe offers insights into how various non-local cosmic phenomenon might emerge simply by reinterpreting current theories’ equations within the framework of a different metatheory.
Finally, every Toy Universe must make predictions that are accountable to the real universe. This Toy Universe is not a flight of fantasy; its Toy Predictions are falsifiable by experiments in the real universe. Because to learn from a Toy Universe; it must be breakable in the real universe.

**Category:** Relativity and Cosmology

[9] **viXra:1307.0050 [pdf]**
*submitted on 2013-07-09 11:48:15*

**Authors:** John Frederick Sweeney

**Comments:** 30 Pages.

Space, the fundamental reality, can only exist in one state
of Aikantha, the coherent state of three - dimensional, cubic
resonances. The Universe remains in the Aikaantha state, fluctuating between the two values of the e logarithm and π /10. The latter value implies a circle with many trigonometric equations related to the Square Root of Five, or the Golden Section. In addition, this forms the basis for Base 60 Math in the Qi Men Dun Jia Model, and thus the icosahedron with its 60 stellated permutations. The value of π /10 thus limits the bounds of visible matter, and gives rise to Pisano Periodicity of the icosahedron. At the same time, the author dispels the current "comic book" notions of black holes: the Aikantha state is the state of black holes, yet misunderstood by modern science.

**Category:** Relativity and Cosmology

[8] **viXra:1307.0049 [pdf]**
*replaced on 2013-07-10 07:47:36*

**Authors:** V.V. Demjanov

**Comments:** 12 Pages. Engl. (12) + Russ. (12)

Is given convincing experimental proof of dependence of the sensitivity **M**ichelson **i**nterferometer (MI) to the detection of velocity *υ* "aether wind" from *relativistics structure* of the refractive index *n* of the optical medium. Appeared, that sensitivity of instrument MI to detection *υ* is dependent from "inertial" of part of index (*n*^{2}–1), induced by polarization particles. When in light-carrying medium MI is absent particles (*n*=**1**.), sensitivity to detection *υ* y MI is zero, since (*n*^{2}–1)=0. Neglect of *relativistic nature* of the index (*n*^{2}–1) in the interpretation of experiments on the MI cited (of those, who interpreted these experiments using the formula Michelson) to the underestimate the speed *υ* in **1**./(*n*^{2}–**1**.)^{1/2} times. For air (*n*=1.0003) the value *υ* always was underestimated of a ~ 40–fold. In this nobody noticed error Michelson (including Lorentz, Einstein, and all, who agreed with them in 1927 at a conference in Pasadena) is the essence took place in the 20^{th} century of falsification experiments of Michelson type, as the alleged "negative". The latent of the form of relativistic structure (*n*^{2}–1) still can not find a reasonable of classical of explanation phenomenon of the angular aberration of light rays in the experiment by Bradley.

**Category:** Relativity and Cosmology

[7] **viXra:1307.0048 [pdf]**
*submitted on 2013-07-09 05:22:46*

**Authors:** Sylwester Kornowski

**Comments:** 6 Pages.

Here, on base of the new cosmology described within the lacking part of ultimate theory, i.e. the Everlasting Theory, the temperature and the energy density in radiation concerning the cosmic neutrino background is precisely estimated in two different ways. The presented new neutrino-like physics leads to N(effective) equal to 3.39 and this result is consistent with the Planck-spacecraft 2013 results. In the new neutrino-like physics appears some analog to the pseudo-Goldstone boson and the classical-quantum time asymmetry that causes that unification of the General Theory of Relativity and the Quantum Mechanics within the same methods is impossible. The new cosmology shows that the inflation was separated in time from the observed expansion of the Universe.

**Category:** Relativity and Cosmology

[6] **viXra:1307.0046 [pdf]**
*submitted on 2013-07-09 03:17:47*

**Authors:** Emmanuil Manousos

**Comments:** 5 Pages.

The law of selfvariations determines quantitatively a slight increase of the masses and electric charges as the common cause of quantum and cosmological phenomena. More specifically, the cosmological data are condensed into one equation, the only unknown being the rest mass of the material particles. This equation predicts and justifies the entirety of the cosmological data. In the present Letter we present the prediction of the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation. We also predict that the early Universe underwent a phase of atomic ionization.

**Category:** Relativity and Cosmology

[5] **viXra:1307.0043 [pdf]**
*submitted on 2013-07-08 13:47:08*

**Authors:** Zbigniew Płotnicki

**Comments:** 107 Pages. Every paragraph of "Proof that special relativity is false" is in two languages: English // Polish

This article contains proofs that theory of special relativity is false and my Diophantine equations solutions.

I am presenting this mathematical work mainly to attract attention to my proof that special relativity is false.

I have worked on diophantine solutions for more than two years. I can prove that my work is completely independent from the work of others and that two years ago I had solution to (as I call it) general case for solutions without little Fermat theorem and simple case with little Fermat theorem, which is much more than others achieved, but I didn’t want to publish it until it would be complete. I sent it to the Polish profesors of mathematics and to myself so I really can prove and document that I had it two years ago. I sent it for example on 10/26/2011 to polish full professor PhD. Edmund Puczylowski from Univeristy of Warsaw and I can prove it with my correspondence with him (I gave full content of this document that I sent to him in Appendix 1). I sent also some diophantine solutions (the simplest case with use of little Fermat theorem) to full professor PhD. Jerzy Tiuryn from Univeristy of Warsaw on 02/23/2011 and I can prove it too.

I’ve searched the Internet and found very little work on this matter:

Wolfram – nothing.

Wikipedia: Fermat Last Theorem/Diophantine equations – single special case;

http://cp4space.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/moda-ch12.pdf – that does not define all solutions

But what I’ve seen is that:

There is given really very little solutions in comparison to my solutions,

There are not all solutions of (as I call it) “general” or at least “simple” case of presented equations for the cases like for example: ua^x+wb^y=vc^z

There is not proof that presented solutions are all such (wich I call “complex not derived”) solutions for any case, like for example: ua^x+wb^y=vc^z,

There is not proof when there exist such (complex not derived) solutions,

There are not solutions for simultaneous equations

There are not solutions for rational exponents

As I know work of others contains only case of solution when
SUM_(i=1..n)(c_i/d*a_i^(x_i))=b^z=(SUM_(i=1..n)(c_i/d*l_i^(x_i))^(t*lcm(x)+1)
or even only SUM_(i=1..n)(a_i^(x_i))=b^z=(SUM_(i=1..n)(l_i^(x_i)))^(t*lcm(x)+1)
which is very little. And does not show how to solve equation without solving qz=t*lcm(x)+1, so this algorithm to solve equation has not complexity O(1) while my has O(1).

There is no solution given for any case (especially for general case) to equations that has coefficient not equal to 1 on the right side.

Which all and much more I’ve done in this article.

If my Diophantine equation solutions are not enough I also give a inverse function to Li(n) function. I think it should be enough.

I named this kind of Diophantine equation that I’ve described in this article after my surname, because I need to refere to them in this article.

Finally I can present part of my work. Thanks for reading. I have more and I will publish it in my book that should come out next year.

Please, give me an endorsement on arxiv (on physics, math), if you can. My username on arxiv is at the end of abstract in the document.

(and let me know at my e-mail address which is at first page of the document)

**Category:** Relativity and Cosmology

[4] **viXra:1307.0035 [pdf]**
*replaced on 2013-10-10 07:48:59*

**Authors:** ChiYi Chen

**Comments:** 9 Pages.

In this paper we firstly present an explicit dynamical equation which satisfies the general principle of relativity under the framework of classical mechanics. In light of this fact, the necessity of Einstein's equivalence principle for the gravity being geometrized should be reexamined. Especially, Einstein's (strong) equivalence principle claims that the inertial force is equivalent to the gravitational force on physical effect. But in fact the new dynamical equation proves that the essence of the inertial force is the real force exerted on the reference object, which can actually be all kinds of forces such as the gravitational force, electromagnetic force and so on. Therefore, in this context we only retain the numerical equality between the inertial mass and gravitational mass and abandon Einstein's (strong) equivalence principle. Consequently, the candidate for the standard clock should be corrected into the mathematical clock which duplicates the real clock equipped by the observer himself. Then an adjusted physical picture for how to convert the gravitational force into a geometric description on space-time is presented. On the other hand, we point out that all cosmological observations are made by the observer at the present time on the earth, instead of any other observers including the comoving observers in the earlier unverse. On this basis, we introduce an extra factor $b(t)$ in $FRW$ cosmological metric to depict the gravitational time dilation effect since the local proper clock may run in a faster and faster rate with the expanding of the universe. In this way, we may obtain a positive value of $\rho+3p$ and avoid the introduction of dark energy in the current universe.

**Category:** Relativity and Cosmology

[3] **viXra:1307.0028 [pdf]**
*submitted on 2013-07-05 09:39:50*

**Authors:** A.W.Beckwith

**Comments:** 4 Pages. will be heavily amended. A start to an analysis

The following question is asked, how does one get a scaled dimensional value to a non zero graviton mass in the present era, from primordial initial conditions of the universe? Using Valev generated mass of the universe values, as well as a Valev valued radius of the universe in the present era, we derive a massive graviton mass of about 10 to the – 62 grams or nucleongmeVm3829102~102−−××<which puts severe constraints upon the relic graviton wavelength. In doing so, we affirm that the initial gravitons are massively redshift expanded, while also putting severe constraints upon the Hubble parameter. Doing so means using the Visser stress energy tensor for massive gravitons. The results so obtained are consistent with massive redshift stretching of primordial EW (or earlier) GW production. If relic GW and gravitons are not forced to be ultra low frequency, then Lavenda’s questions as to the soundness of inflation have to be revisited

**Category:** Relativity and Cosmology

[2] **viXra:1307.0019 [pdf]**
*submitted on 2013-07-03 17:07:48*

**Authors:** Pierre Réal Gosselin

**Comments:** 29 Pages. web site : http://phrenocarpe.org/zhp/index.html (english / francais); Latex, DVI and PDF

As an explanation of the radiation's redshift from far away galaxies, we propose the progressive transformation of the electromagnetic radiation following the classical equations of Maxwell and the principle of energy conservation. We derive Hubble law and give a value of " Ho " computed from the anomalous behavior of Pioneer satellite. Since luminosity is redshift dependent we recommend to revise any research involving luminosity associated parameter. We present a modified formula for the distance modulus and evaluate the maximum distance possible for cosmological observations.

**Category:** Relativity and Cosmology

[1] **viXra:1307.0008 [pdf]**
*submitted on 2013-07-01 13:07:14*

**Authors:** Miroslav Sukenik, Jozef Sima

**Comments:** 2 Pages.

In our model of Expansive Nondecelerative Universe it is supposed nonstationary nature of gravitational field. It allows to localize its energy density. An attempt to localize the energy density of a Schwarzschild wormhole leads to a conclusion that its intensity would be inversely proportional to the third power of distance. It thus follows the impossibility of existence of wormholes from our model.

**Category:** Relativity and Cosmology