Relativity and Cosmology

1012 Submissions

[7] viXra:1012.0044 [pdf] submitted on 22 Dec 2010

Relativistic Dimensional Analysis

Authors: Jose Alverez Lopez
Comments: 23 pages.

The Lorenatzian "contraction" for length, time, mass and temperature - taken as functions of a dimensional equation - enable the author to define the mathematical structure of the constants of nature. In this way the a priori determinaation of all the constants of nature has been rendered possible
Category: Relativity and Cosmology

[6] viXra:1012.0038 [pdf] submitted on 17 Dec 2010

Units of a Metric Tensor and Physical Interpretation of the Gravitational Constant.

Authors: Boris Hikin
Comments: 9 pages

It is shown that writing the metric tensor in dimensionfull form is mathematically more appropriate and allows a simple interpretation of the gravitational constant as an emergent parameter. It is also shown that the value of the gravitational constant is due to the contribution of all the particles in the Universe. Newton's law of gravitation is derived from atomic considerations only. The Dirac's large number is related to the number of particles in the Universe.
Category: Relativity and Cosmology

[5] viXra:1012.0037 [pdf] submitted on 15 Dec 2010

Unification of Quantum Mechanics (QM), Relativity (TR) and Classical Physics (CF)

Authors: Peter Sujak
Comments: 5 pages

In this paper the inconsistency of contemporary quantities of energy and momentum in QM, TR and CF are demonstrated .To correlate these quantities inevitability of installation rest momentum po and total momentum pt according to TR rest and total energy concept is required. It is explained that: (see paper)
Category: Relativity and Cosmology

[4] viXra:1012.0030 [pdf] submitted on 14 Dec 2010

How the Universe Works Differently

Authors: Noel Eberz
Comments: 6 pages

While entitled ‘differently’ is a big order, it is not so much refutation but alternative views essentially ‘decoded’ from the multiple disciplines of general science. These four concise assertions can find correlation with both the fine and large scale structure of the universe: Time as only Now, Mass as the confinement of Energy, Defining a base energy form – Optical Gre theory, Interpreting an electromagnetic Space fabric. In concert these ideas are interpreted in three parts: Why Mass & Energy are different or are they? Justifying an Electromagnetic Space fabric Originality in decoding Complexity.
Category: Relativity and Cosmology

[3] viXra:1012.0018 [pdf] submitted on 7 Dec 2010

On the General Solution to Einstein’s Vacuum Field and Its Implications for Relativistic Degeneracy

Authors: Stephen J. Crothers
Comments: 6 pages

The general solution to Einstein’s vacuum field equations for the point-mass in all its configurations must be determined in such a way as to provide a means by which an infinite sequence of particular solutions can be readily constructed. It is from such a solution that the underlying geometry of Einstein’s universe can be rightly explored. I report here on the determination of the general solution and its consequences for the theoretical basis of relativistic degeneracy, i. e. gravitational collapse and the black hole.
Category: Relativity and Cosmology

[2] viXra:1012.0015 [pdf] submitted on 4 Dec 2010

Simple Table of Forces and Energy States

Authors: John A. Gowan
Comments: 28 pages

This table may be read like an English paragraph. Row one recapitulates the the creation of matter in the "Big Bang". The universe begins with light, free electromagnetic energy - a perfectly symmetric form of energy. The role of gravity at this stage is to provide sufficient negative energy to counterbalance the positive energy of the "Creation Event", such that the cosmos is born from a state of zero net energy and charge. The intrinsic motion of light (which is the entropy drive of light) creates space, the expanding and cooling entropy/conservation domain of free energy. The interaction of high-energy light with the metric structure of spacetime creates virtual particle-antiparticle pairs of primordial leptoquarks (leptoquarks are primordial leptons broken into three subunits, the quarks). (See: "The Particle Table".) Symmetry is maintained so long as there are equal numbers of particles vs antiparticles. Row one ends with symmetrybreaking of the primordial leptoquark pairs and the production of single (matter) baryons and leptons by the action of the Higgs boson and the weak force Intermediate Vector Bosons (IVBs). (See: "Table of the Higgs Cascade".) (Although leptoquark particle-antiparticle pairs are produced in equal numbers, electrically neutral antimatter leptoquarks apparently decay at a slightly faster rate than their matter counterparts.) The sub-elementary quarks carry fractional charges necessary to the production of electrically neutral leptoquarks, allowing the neutrals to live long enough to undergo asymmetric weak force decays. These decays should also produce leptoquark neutrinos, which are "dark matter" candidates. (See: "The Origin of Matter and Information".)
Category: Relativity and Cosmology

[1] viXra:1012.0006 [pdf] replaced on 11 Jan 2011

Reasons for Relativistic Mass and Its Influence on Duff's Claims that Dimensionful Quantities Are Physically Nonexistent

Authors: J Kokošar
Comments: 11 pages

The main argument against the relativistic mass is that it does not tell us anything more than the total energy tells us, although it is not incorrect. It is shown that this is not true, because new aspects of special relativity (SR) can be noticed. One reason for this de nition is to show a relation between time dilation and relativistic mass. This relation can be further used to present a connection between space-time and matter more clearly, and to show that space-time does not exist without matter. This means a simpler presentation than is shown with Einstein's general covariance. Therefore, this opposes that SR is only a theory of space-time geometry. Phenomenon of increasing of relativistic mass with speed can be used for a gradual transition from Newtonian mechanics to SR. The postulates, which are used for the de nition of SR, are therefore still clearer and the total derivation of the Lorentz transformation is clearer. Such derivation also gives a more realistic example for the debate regarding Du 's claims. It gives also some counter-arguments for some details of debate about physical nonexistence of dimensionful units and quantities. These details are why three elementary units exist and why a direct physical measurement is not the only possibility for physical existence. Such derivation thus shows that relativistic mass is di erently presented to us as relativistic energy.
Category: Relativity and Cosmology