[18] **viXra:1909.0656 [pdf]**
*submitted on 2019-09-29 16:45:30*

**Authors:** Stephen H. Jarvis

**Comments:** 14 Pages.

In taking up from the preliminary papers [1-11], the idea of gravity as a process of the nature of space shall be presented; the idea of space will be defined in a way that is able to support how Newton derived the equation for gravity using astronomical observations consistent with gravity being an “immediate” field force and not one travelling at “c”, while accommodating for Einstein’s “curvature of spacetime” theory for gravity. In using a definition of space that carries the notion of gravity being an immediate field force, a number of key features of quantum mechanics are able to be explained regarding the behaviour of light, this by defining “space” as “nothingness”, and as a type of feature of “uncertainty” that a quantum reference would abide by, as though space has its own “program” as “nothing”, putting everything within it as that which is defined as uncertain, not clearly definable, and thus must exist randomly, like a process of natural uncertainty. It is then highlighted how Einstein’s special and general relativity is incorrect in its application of the idea of measuring inertial frames of reference using the speed of light in his assuming, through such a process, that gravity, and thus inertial frames of reference, operate at light speed, despite relativity theory being accurate with the idea of gravity as a curvature of spacetime. Finally, an update to the method of proof in paper 7 [7], “Golden Ratio Entropic Gravity: Gravitational Singularity Field Testing”, is offered based on this new understanding of space and gravity, with associated confirmatory results posted.

**Category:** Quantum Gravity and String Theory

[17] **viXra:1909.0623 [pdf]**
*submitted on 2019-09-28 10:31:14*

**Authors:** Richard Blum

**Comments:** 35 Pages. (c) Richard Blum 2019

The Existence Framework offers a new paradigm for constructing a theory of quantum gravity. Its development was based upon an analysis of past major breakthroughs in physics, which revealed that several basic principles were utilized in the formation of each innovated theory. The assumption is that a next major breakthrough will require utilization of these same principles. The principles include: Equivalence, Hierarchical Structure, Quantum Discreteness, and Simple Underlying Dynamics. Utilization of these concepts leads to the proposition that all matter and energy is comprised of time and space, which itself is a discrete substance comprised of a more primary, binary element referred to as existence.

**Category:** Quantum Gravity and String Theory

[16] **viXra:1909.0525 [pdf]**
*submitted on 2019-09-24 11:41:23*

**Authors:** Kaushal Timilsina

**Comments:** 61 Pages. It's a lot of fun and perhaps very creative to wonder and explore ideas from what each possibility leads to.

In 4 articles on abstract Physics, I explore perspectives on 1) what would become a theory of interacting manifolds, 2) emergence and virtual particles, 3) The loops in spacetime 4) Self-interaction and time, and a discussion on the Riemann hypothesis.
The discussions on abstract Physics do not contain any mathematical basis, and purely explore the sense of wonder in such philosophical perspectives. The discussion on the Riemann hypothesis contains some mathematics which is very non-rigorous. All of these articles are related to a more formal mathematical intuition, but still not very rigorous in this other article: Riemann zeroes and manifolds - http://viXra.org/abs/1909.0500

**Category:** Quantum Gravity and String Theory

[15] **viXra:1909.0518 [pdf]**
*replaced on 2019-10-01 14:48:38*

**Authors:** Sylwester Kornowski

**Comments:** 7 Pages.

Many basic ideas applied in the Scale-Symmetric Theory (SST) have counterparts in the Bambara and Dogon mythology.

**Category:** Quantum Gravity and String Theory

[14] **viXra:1909.0500 [pdf]**
*replaced on 2019-09-27 12:35:33*

**Authors:** Kaushal Timilsina

**Comments:** 16 Pages. The freedom of learning and the wonder of asking: What questions can you ask? What do they mean or what do you want them to mean? And can you make answers, What answers can you make and what do they mean (or perhaps what do you mean?).

4 pages of an update, has been added at the end. A discussion on a better mathematical intuition towards a theory of interacting manifolds includes the first question (and the second one as well), in the theory of interacting manifolds. The key discussion includes how an infinite union of singularities from finite dimensional manifolds of any dimensions each (possibly different), can be used to construct an infinite dimensional manifold and how that helps us understand singularities in finite dimensional manifolds, and hinting at an insight towards interactions between finite dimensional manifolds.

**Category:** Quantum Gravity and String Theory

[13] **viXra:1909.0487 [pdf]**
*replaced on 2019-11-07 04:45:27*

**Authors:** Michael John Sarnowski

**Comments:** 3 Pages. Included new data from Nature

The 2018 CODATA proton charge radius is 8.414(19)*10^(-16) meters[1] A new measurement in Nature, “Progress on the proton-radius puzzle” is 8.33 ± 0.10 *10^(-16) meters(4).This information may help in deciphering the construction of the universe. The value is not precise enough to make conclusion. This paper proposes a couple precise values. One being 8.40077662 × 10^-16 meters These numbers are from the Compton wavelength of the neutron. The calculations for the proton charge radius, done in this paper, are a continuation of Spinning Sphere Theory started in the paper “Gravity most related to the Proton Mass, Charge most related to the Electron Mass”[2] where the universe is discovered to be spinning spheres made out spinning spheres for many layers which is better described in “Predicting the Gravitational Constant from the New Physics of a Rotating Universe”[3]

**Category:** Quantum Gravity and String Theory

[12] **viXra:1909.0486 [pdf]**
*submitted on 2019-09-22 07:25:26*

**Authors:** JianFei Chen

**Comments:** 5 Pages.

As has been found: In a hydrogen atom, if the proton increase 1/12 of the total mass of the electron, then the mass ratio of proton and electron is exactly an integer of 1836; And in a hydrogen molecule, hydrogen molecular bond energy is equal to 1/12 of the kinetic energy of two electrons. Both of two attraction involve the same ratio of 1/12, which should been determined by the same rules of energy. Author has explained the format process of the two attraction with energy and energy waves. The purpose of this paper is to study the four fundamental forces with energy and energy waves. Email: eastear@outlook.com eastear@163.com

**Category:** Quantum Gravity and String Theory

[11] **viXra:1909.0477 [pdf]**
*replaced on 2019-09-23 08:20:19*

**Authors:** Sylwester Kornowski

**Comments:** 4 Pages.

According to the Scale-Symmetric Theory (SST), there is the two-component spacetime composed of the SST Higgs field (which consists of tachyons) and the Einstein spacetime (which consists of the neutrino-antineutrino pairs). The neutrinos are built of the superluminal binary systems of closed strings (we call them the gravitons or entanglons). The closed strings in a graviton have parallel spins and opposite internal helicity. Gravitons are placed in the SST Higgs field so they carry the smallest "piece" of gravitational field. Neutrinos produce gradient in the SST Higgs field - it is the elementary gravitational field defined by the gravitational constant G. Generally, the gradients/gravitational-fields are the classical fields but at distances smaller than 3510.1831 multiplied by the equatorial radius of neutrinos there appear groups of gravitons emitted and absorbed by the core of neutrinos. Here we described phenomena that concern the quantum region of neutrinos. The Neutrino Quantum Gravity (NQG) leads to the volumetric quantum confinement of the neutrino-antineutrino pairs that is the origin of the masses of scalars in physics.

**Category:** Quantum Gravity and String Theory

[10] **viXra:1909.0476 [pdf]**
*submitted on 2019-09-22 15:04:09*

**Authors:** Janko Kokosar

**Comments:** 8 Pages.

In a paper in year 2011 the author implicitly predicted the masses of the neutrinos using some old empirical formulae. Now this prediction is explicitly written, mass of one neutrino is calculated as 21.44240(50) meV, respectively 21.36459(49) meV, dependent of the model. (The other masses of the neutrinos are connected with one of these values.) According to the upper bounds of neutrinos masses in 2005, and respectively in 2019, the author calculates that the upper bound of the lightest neutrino mass approached between 3 times to 20 times to the predicted value in 2019 according to 2005. At the same time, cosmologists predict that in the next five years we will have values of the neutrino masses, not only the lower and upper bounds. Thus this prediction can be tested, and maybe p-value for accident will not be large. Besides, the prediction of the gravitational constant with the same formulae is also mentioned.

**Category:** Quantum Gravity and String Theory

[9] **viXra:1909.0463 [pdf]**
*submitted on 2019-09-21 09:47:33*

**Authors:** Richard L. Marker

**Comments:** 18 Pages.

This paper develops the theoretical ratio of the gravitational force to
electromagnetic force between two electrons. The resulting ratio produces a
gravitational constant with the precision of electromagnetic constants.

**Category:** Quantum Gravity and String Theory

[8] **viXra:1909.0428 [pdf]**
*replaced on 2019-10-01 15:41:09*

**Authors:** M. D. Sheppeard

**Comments:** 16 Pages.

In quantum logic, the emergence of spacetime and related symmetries goes hand in hand with the emergence of the real and complex numbers themselves. In this paper, we show how finite fields are surprisingly sufficient for most physical questions, once we throw away classical geometrical models in favour of categorical axioms. In particular, generalised Pauli matrix algebras are closely related to braid and ribbon diagrams, and holographic information for mass localisation gains its intuition from algebras for anyon condensation. We discuss definitions of homology and cohomology associated to braids, recalling the twistor construction of massive solutions in H2.

**Category:** Quantum Gravity and String Theory

[7] **viXra:1909.0417 [pdf]**
*replaced on 2019-10-22 02:36:40*

**Authors:** Leo Vuyk

**Comments:** 55 Pages.

This consciousness theory of everything, also called Quantum FFF Theory, (FFF = Function Follows Form) is a semi classical theory based on a symmetrical Big Bang into 8 or 12 Charge Parity (CP) symmetric copy universes.
However such a cyclic multiverse seems to be only possible with special ingredients,
1: a propeller shaped fermion able transform by collision and spin in two pitch directions.
2: A compact String knot based dark matter Fuzzball black hole with enough rigid string content, to become stable against the fierce oscillations of the oscillating vacuum lattice and repelling all spinning Fermions. but not other black hole nuclei or photons.
As a result, The Quantum FFF Theory is a semi classical theory because it describes reality by the real collision and shape transformation processes of real sub quantum rigid stringy multiverse entangled particles.
Each particle is supposed to be conscious by its entanglement with 8 or 12 CP symmetric copy particles located inside 8 or 12 Charge Parity (CP) symmetric universal bubbles at long distance in raspberry shape.

**Category:** Quantum Gravity and String Theory

[6] **viXra:1909.0318 [pdf]**
*submitted on 2019-09-15 20:50:16*

**Authors:** Adrian Ferent

**Comments:** 428 Pages. © 2014 Adrian Ferent

The EHT picture is wrong; this shows how Low is the level of knowledge of the Black Holes in universities, in research centers
“There is no Gravitational redshift around the Black Hole, around the Event horizon of the Black Hole in Ferent Quantum Gravity, like the red color in the EHT picture of the Black Hole”
Adrian Ferent
“All the photons interacting with Gravitons will fall inside the Black Hole. We will see only the photons which do not interact with Gravitons that is why we see the White light around the Black Hole, not the read light like in the EHT picture of the Black Hole”
Adrian Ferent
“We do not see the black Event horizon, like in the EHT picture”
Adrian Ferent
“Einstein supermassive Black Hole picture from EHT is Black and Red; Ferent supermassive Black Hole picture is White”
Adrian Ferent
“Ferent supermassive Black Hole picture is White; the EHT picture of the Black Hole is wrong, we do not see the black Event horizon because of the large luminosity as the result of gas and matter being accreted and we do not see the read light in the EHT picture around the Event horizon because at 3rs the Gravitational redshift does not exist”
Adrian Ferent
“You do not need a telescope to see a Black Hole, you need only an amazing brain to see it and a new Gravitation theory, Ferent Quantum Gravity”
Adrian Ferent
“At this distance, 26,000 light-years from Sgr A* the Gravitational flux on Earth is very small, but the Gravitons from Sgr A* destroy cells on Earth”
Adrian Ferent
“There are no Extraterrestrial civilizations in the center of our galaxy, because of Sgr A*”
Adrian Ferent
“Einstein gravitation theory is wrong and Ferent Quantum Gravity is right”
Adrian Ferent
The UCLA picture of a Black Hole is right and the EHT picture is wrong!
https://ucla.in/2NVbhCh
The scientists from UCLA are right!
‘The new findings are based on observations of the black hole — which is called Sagittarius A*, or Sgr A* — during four nights in April and May at the Keck Observatory. The brightness surrounding the black hole always varies somewhat, but the scientists were stunned by the extreme variations in brightness during that timeframe, including their observations on May 13.’
The energy of the Gravitons emitted by the Black Hole is much higher than the energy of the photons.
“All the photons interacting with Gravitons will fall inside the Black Hole. We will see only the photons which do not interact with Gravitons that is why we see the White light around the Black Hole, not the read light like in the EHT picture of the Black Hole”
Adrian Ferent
This means:
“There is no Gravitational redshift around the Black Hole, around the Event horizon of the Black Hole in Ferent Quantum Gravity, like the red color in the EHT picture of the Black Hole”
Adrian Ferent
That is why the EHT picture of the Black Hole is wrong.
This is another proof that:
“Einstein gravitation theory is wrong and Ferent Quantum Gravity is right”
Adrian Ferent
The read light in the EHT picture of the Black Hole is the Gravitational redshift around the Black Hole, at 3rs around the Event horizon of the Black Hole.
The EHT picture of the Black Hole is wrong:
The Schwarzschild radius rs of an object is proportional to the mass.
The Schwarzschild radius rs of the Sgr A* is 12×10^6 km
rs = 2GM / c^2
Between rs and 3rs around the Event horizon in EHT picture is red light, it is the Gravitational redshift.
How I explained:
“All the photons interacting with Gravitons will fall inside the Black Hole. We will see only the photons which do not interact with Gravitons that is why we see the White light around the Black Hole, not the read light like in the EHT picture of the Black Hole”
Adrian Ferent
This means:
The read light in the EHT picture of the Black Hole, around the Event horizon is wrong.
That is why:
“The EHT picture of the Black Hole is wrong and Einstein gravitation theory is wrong”
Adrian Ferent
“The picture of the Black Hole is white not red like the EHT picture of the Black Hole”
Adrian Ferent
“I am the first who explained the Gravitational redshift”
Adrian Ferent
“We do not see the black Event horizon like in the EHT picture”
Adrian Ferent
“In Ferent Quantum Gravity the supermassive Black Hole picture is white because around it there are a lot of collisions between stars and planets. The large luminosity is the result of gas and matter being accreted by the supermassive Black Hole.”
Adrian Ferent
How easy was accepted the wrong EHT picture of the Black Hole by universities, research centers, peer-reviewed journals…
“The EHT picture of the Black Hole is wrong; this shows how Low is the level of knowledge of the Black Holes and Dark Matter in universities, research centers”
Adrian Ferent
“Einstein supermassive Black Hole is a Singularity; Ferent supermassive Black Hole has very small volume”
Adrian Ferent
The scientists from UCLA are wrong!
No danger to Earth
‘The black hole is some 26,000 light-years away and poses no danger to our planet. Do said the radiation would have to be 10 billion times as bright as what the astronomers detected to affect life on Earth.’
“Gravitons emitted by Black Holes kill Aliens”
Adrian Ferent
“The energy of the Gravitons inside a Black Hole, is much higher than the energy of gluons”
Adrian Ferent
“At this distance, 26,000 light-years from Sgr A* the Gravitational flux on Earth is very small, but the Gravitons from Sgr A* destroy cells on Earth”
Adrian Ferent
“Gravitational Radiation is the most dangerous because it travels the farthest and is the most penetrating”
Adrian Ferent
“I am the first who explained the lack of extraterrestrial civilizations”
Adrian Ferent
“Extraterrestrial civilizations are on planets moving around stars far away from Black Holes”
Adrian Ferent
“There are no Extraterrestrial civilizations in the center of our galaxy, because of Sgr A*”
Adrian Ferent
Conclusions
“Einstein supermassive Black Hole picture from EHT is Black and Red; Ferent supermassive Black Hole picture is White”
Adrian Ferent
“Ferent supermassive Black Hole picture is White; the EHT picture of the Black Hole is wrong, we do not see the black Event horizon because of the large luminosity as the result of gas and matter being accreted and we do not see the read light in the EHT picture around the Event horizon because at 3rs the Gravitational redshift does not exist”
Adrian Ferent
“The EHT picture of the Black Hole is wrong; this shows how Low is the level of knowledge of the Black Holes and Dark Matter in universities, research centers”
Adrian Ferent
“At this distance, 26,000 light-years from Sgr A* the Gravitational flux on Earth is very small, but the Gravitons from Sgr A* destroy cells on Earth”
Adrian Ferent
“There are no Extraterrestrial civilizations in the center of our galaxy, because of Sgr A*”
Adrian Ferent
This is another proof that:
“Einstein gravitation theory is wrong and Ferent Quantum Gravity is right”
Adrian Ferent
248. I am the first who discovered that there is no Gravitational redshift around the Black Hole, around the Event horizon of the Black Hole in Ferent Quantum Gravity, like the red color in the EHT picture of the Black Hole
249. I am the first who discovered that all the photons interacting with Gravitons will fall inside the Black Hole. We will see only the photons which do not interact with Gravitons that is why we see the White light around the Black Hole, not the read light like in the EHT picture of the Black Hole
250. I am the first who discovered that we do not see the black Event horizon, like in the EHT picture
251. I am the first who discovered that Einstein supermassive Black Hole picture from EHT is Black and Red; Ferent supermassive Black Hole picture is White
252. I am the first who discovered that Ferent supermassive Black Hole picture is White; the EHT picture of the Black Hole is wrong, we do not see the black Event horizon because of the large luminosity as the result of gas and matter being accreted and we do not see the read light in the EHT picture around the Event horizon because at 3rs the Gravitational redshift does not exist
253. I am the first who discovered that the EHT picture of the Black Hole is wrong; this shows how Low is the level of knowledge of the Black Holes and Dark Matter in universities, research centers
254. I am the first who discovered that at this distance, 26,000 light-years from Sgr A* the Gravitational flux on Earth is very small, but the Gravitons from Sgr A* destroy cells on Earth
255. I am the first who discovered that there are no Extraterrestrial civilizations in the center of our galaxy, because of Sgr A*
256. I am the first who discovered that Einstein gravitation theory is wrong and Ferent Quantum Gravity is right

**Category:** Quantum Gravity and String Theory

[5] **viXra:1909.0277 [pdf]**
*submitted on 2019-09-14 04:45:48*

**Authors:** Rodney Bartlett

**Comments:** 27 Pages.

I think the best way to describe this article is by listing the
CONTENTS -
INTRODUCTION - Speculations about life, the universe and everything which have a basis in science
SECTION 1 - STEFAN-BOLTZMANN LAW, RADIATION PRESSURE FROM THERMODYNAMICS, "VECTOR-TENSOR-SCALAR GEOMETRY" ANALOGOUS TO STRESS TENSOR / EIGENVECTORS / EIGENVALUES
SECTION 2 - VECTOR-TENSOR-SCALAR GEOMETRY AND THE NUCLEAR FORCES
SECTION 3 - THE STRESS TENSOR ON THE COSMIC LEVEL
SECTION 4 - BITS AND TOPOLOGY – CONTINUING THE THEME OF THE MOBIUS STRIP AND MATHEMATICAL MATTER
SECTION 5 - ANALOGY OF QUANTUM SPIN AND MATRIX ARRAY, WITH ELECTROMAGNETIC AND GRAVITATIONAL WAVES PRODUCED FROM PURE MATHEMATICS
SECTION 6 - DARK MATTER, DARK ENERGY AND A HIGHER DIMENSION OF SPACE-TIME
SECTION 7A - EXPLAINING OCEAN TIDES WHEN GENERAL RELATIVITY SAYS GRAVITY IS A PUSH CAUSED BY THE CURVATURE OF SPACE-TIME
7B - M-SIGMA
7C - GEYSERS ON SATURN'S MOON ENCELADUS
7D - A BRIEF HISTORY OF GRAVITY

**Category:** Quantum Gravity and String Theory

[4] **viXra:1909.0235 [pdf]**
*submitted on 2019-09-10 22:45:46*

**Authors:** Adrian Ferent

**Comments:** 414 Pages. © 2014 Adrian Ferent

“Nobody understands Gravitation, because nobody understands Dark Matter”
Adrian Ferent
“Dark Matter has another Structure, based on Ferent length lF = 1.296 × 10^(-69) m much smaller than Planck length lP = 1.616199×10^(-35) m”
Adrian Ferent
“Quantum Mechanics can't explain Gravity because nobody understands Dark Matter”
Adrian Ferent
You learned from your professors that nobody understands Quantum Mechanics.
We understand Quantum Mechanics because there are a lot of applications of Quantum Mechanics.
But nobody understands what an electron is!
“The electron is a photon around Dark Matter”
Adrian Ferent
“The Dark Matter electron is the Dark Matter inside the electron”
Adrian Ferent
The equation for an elementary particle made of 2 particles, a Matter particle and a Dark Matter particle, is the Ferent equation for elementary particle as a quantum system:
“Ferent equation for elementary particles:”
Adrian Ferent
“Ferent equation for elementary particle, made of 2 particles, a Matter particle and a Dark Matter particle, is the Unification between Matter and Dark Matter!”
Adrian Ferent
Because Einstein Gravitation theory is wrong, nobody understands Gravitation!
Your professors will not say ‘nobody understands Gravitation’ because that means what you learned at Universities about Gravitation is wrong, the articles in peer-review journals are wrong, your Science books are wrong…
“Einstein bent the space, Ferent unbent the space”
Adrian Ferent
“Newton and Einstein did not understand Gravitation, they calculated Gravitation”
Adrian Ferent
“Einstein's equivalence principle is wrong because the gravitational force experienced locally is caused by a negative energy, gravitons energy and the force experienced by an observer in a non-inertial (accelerated) frame of reference is caused by a positive energy”
Adrian Ferent
LIGO: “Einstein’s gravitational waves do not exist, how they can detect them?”
Adrian Ferent
“Because Einstein’s gravitation theory is wrong, LQG, String theory… are wrong theories”
Adrian Ferent
Why nobody understands Gravitation?
“Nobody understands Gravitation, because nobody understands Dark Matter”
Adrian Ferent
“Gravitational force is mediated by gravitons faster than the speed of light, with negative momentum”
Adrian Ferent
“I quantized the gravitational field with gravitons”
Adrian Ferent
“Gravitational field is Gravitons”
Adrian Ferent
Why Quantum Mechanics can't explain Gravity?
Ferent Quantum Gravity:
“Quantum Mechanics can't explain Gravity because nobody understands Dark Matter”
Adrian Ferent
In Ferent Quantum Gravity I explained what Dark Matter is:
I discovered during the Big Bang:
“Two important walls:
The Ferent wall: here at time t = 1.294 × 10^(-86) s were created Dark Matter, Dark Photons and Gravitons.
The Planck wall: here at time t = 5.391 × 10^(-44) s were created Matter and Photons”
Adrian Ferent
Hawking and all the scientists did not understand Gravitation, Dark Matter and Black holes.
“Black holes are Dark Matter”
Adrian Ferent
“Dark Matter does not have temperature”
Adrian Ferent
“Gravitons from Black holes transform Matter, ‘heat’ in Dark Matter.”
Adrian Ferent
“Dark Matter has another Structure, based on Ferent length lF = 1.296 × 10^(-69) m much smaller than Planck length lP = 1.616199×10^(-35) m”
Adrian Ferent
Dark Matter does not emit, reflects and absorbs light.
“Dark Matter is not ‘invisible’, is not ‘transparent’ Matter.”
Adrian Ferent
That is why Gerard 't Hooft, Stephen Hawking and Leonard Susskind are wrong, because the information is lost inside a black hole.
I discovered the equation of the Dark Matter universe:
“In our Universe at Ferent wall emerged the Dark Matter universe, at Planck wall emerged the Matter universe and at Spiritual wall emerged the Spiritual universe.”
Adrian Ferent
“I discovered that: a < h < s”
Adrian Ferent
“Ferent equation of the material and spiritual Universe:”
Adrian Ferent
Where: Ψ – the wave function of the Universe, material and spiritual
m1i – the mass of Matter elementary particle i
m2j – the mass of Dark Matter elementary particle j
m3k – the mass of Spiritual Matter elementary particle k
r1N – the position of Matter elementary particle N
r2M – the position of Dark Matter elementary particle M
r3L – the position of Spiritual Matter elementary particle L
Today all the Nobel Laureates, the greatest scientists, your professors… were not capable to explain Dark Matter, they talk about Transparent matter because they can not see Dark Matter, they talk about Baryonic matter, Non-baryonic matter like axions, they talk about cold, warm or hot Dark Matte, about Spersymmetric Particles as Dark Matter…but NOT BEYOND THE PLANCK WALL.
Now they Stole my theory and they went beyond the Planck wall! Those who do not have a Gravitation theory, they started stealing my theory of Gravity.
https://www.sciencealert.com/new-study-brings-receipts-to-demonstrate-dark-matter-may-be-older-than-the-big-bang?fbclid=IwAR2IU7KARSt6FlR1SXAnRFR7NPzz-QHTj5EpuvAq_pwfxtZlv2GYFP3CVCY
The professors from the peer–review journal did not Search about ‘Beyond the Planck Wall’ because they do not know, do not understand how difficult is to go beyond the Planck Wall.
Before me nobody was able to think what is beyond Planck Wall.
Because all the Scientists do not understand Dark Matter, they have only wrong theories about Dark Matter!
The biggest assault on Ferent Quantum Gravity and on my Dark Matter theory will be in October (Dark Matter Days). Dark matter-themed events will be hosted throughout the month by universities, laboratories, and institutions around the world.
‘We just don’t know what that missing mass and energy are, hence the names ’dark matter’ and ‘dark energy’.
Understanding dark matter will shine a light on the nature of the universe we live in. We are not yet sure if these discoveries will require a new understanding of physics.’
“All Nobel Laureates were ignorant, thinking inside the Planck Universe; nobody was able before me to go beyond the Planck Wall”
Adrian Ferent
“Because Ferent Quantum Gravity is a new theory, I did not use References”
Adrian Ferent
“In Ferent Quantum Gravity (FQG) Black holes are not cold or hot, Black holes are Dark Matter and do not have Temperature”
Adrian Ferent
“Virtual particles do not exist in Ferent Quantum Gravity, virtual particles exist in Quantum Field theory.”
Adrian Ferent
“Event horizons do not exist in Ferent Quantum Gravity, event horizons exist in Einstein General Theory of Relativity. At Event horizons there are only Gravitons without Hawking radiation.”
Adrian Ferent
245. I am the first who discovered that nobody understands Gravitation, because nobody understands Dark Matter
246. I am the first who discovered that Dark Matter has another Structure, based on Ferent length lF = 1.296 × 10^(-69) m much smaller than Planck length lP = 1.616199×10^(-35) m
247. I am the first who discovered that Quantum Mechanics can't explain Gravity because nobody understands Dark Matter

**Category:** Quantum Gravity and String Theory

[3] **viXra:1909.0138 [pdf]**
*replaced on 2019-09-07 16:48:41*

**Authors:** Ervin Goldfain

**Comments:** 3 Pages.

We compile a short list of reasons explaining why Quantum Theory (QT) and General Relativity (GR) cannot be trivially reconciled. Our opinion reflects a personal viewpoint and is likely to stand at odds with mainstream beliefs on Quantum Gravity, Black Hole phenomenology and related foundational topics.

**Category:** Quantum Gravity and String Theory

[2] **viXra:1909.0078 [pdf]**
*submitted on 2019-09-05 01:30:57*

**Authors:** Dong-Yih Bau

**Comments:** 9 Pages. Journal-ref: IJASRM 3 (3): 30-34 (2018). DOI:10.36282/IJASRM/3.3.2018.496

Universal laws elucidate a basic understanding of nature. Imagine how marvellous it would be to have universal laws in biology as there are in physics. Herein, we apply Einstein’s principle theory as a constraining method to identify a new universal biological law (or principle) called the success/failure system principle. Based on this principle, we develop a principle theory called the success/failure system hypothesis, which suggests that every planet has the potential to evolve into a success/failure system. Then, we describe the implications regarding our place in the universe, the role of universal laws in biology in a final theory, and the current global challenges of sustainability and scientific ethics. This paper concludes with the interdisciplinary interest and scientific significance of this hypothesis. The path to truth: Einstein’s cosmos, a theory of the universe, thoroughly includes a cosmic order defined by three theories, quantum mechanics, general relativity, and the success/failure system. With regards to the theory of the universe, current quantum gravity, string theory, and all other possible theories of the universe, except Einstein’s cosmos, are definitely not final. However, we seek a final theory of the universe. Thus, we suggest researching Einstein’s cosmos immediately and seriously. As a prologue to this new academic enterprise, we have pioneered this enterprise by storing several papers in viXra, in hope of the scientific community’s attention. Who is more intelligent than Einstein, a human with cosmic religious feeling? Today, Einstein’s scientific thoughts still firmly lead the scientific community to a final theory of the universe.

**Category:** Quantum Gravity and String Theory

[1] **viXra:1909.0048 [pdf]**
*submitted on 2019-09-02 07:54:28*

**Authors:** George Rajna

**Comments:** 24 Pages.

The measurement is done by pointing laser light at a liquid and seeing how it is reflected. Compared to weight-spring seismometers, the PLI can detect angular motion in addition to translational motion (up-and-down and side-to-side), and it can pick up low-frequency motion with a very high precision. [21] A team of physicists and astronomers from Northwestern University is poised to lead gravitational-wave astronomy into its next evolution. [20] The improvement will see the twin observatories-located near Hanford, Washington and Livingston, Louisiana in the US-double their sensitivity to gravitational waves. [19] A group of scientists from the Niels Bohr Institute (NBI) at the University of Copenhagen will soon start developing a new line of technical equipment in order to dramatically improve gravitational wave detectors. [18] A global team of scientists, including two University of Mississippi physicists, has found that the same instruments used in the historic discovery of gravitational waves caused by colliding black holes could help unlock the secrets of dark matter, a mysterious and as-yet-unobserved component of the universe. [17] The lack of so-called "dark photons" in electron-positron collision data rules out scenarios in which these hypothetical particles explain the muon's magnetic moment. [16] By reproducing the complexity of the cosmos through unprecedented simulations, a new study highlights the importance of the possible behaviour of very high-energy photons. In their journey through intergalactic magnetic fields, such photons could be transformed into axions and thus avoid being absorbed. [15] Scientists have detected a mysterious X-ray signal that could be caused by dark matter streaming out of our Sun's core. Hidden photons are predicted in some extensions of the Standard Model of particle physics, and unlike WIMPs they would interact electromagnetically with normal matter. In particle physics and astrophysics, weakly interacting massive particles, or WIMPs, are among the leading hypothetical particle physics candidates for dark matter. The gravitational force attracting the matter, causing concentration of the matter in a small space and leaving much space with low matter concentration: dark matter and energy. There is an asymmetry between the mass of the electric charges, for example proton and electron, can understood by the asymmetrical Planck Distribution Law. This temperature dependent energy distribution is asymmetric around the maximum intensity, where the annihilation of matter and antimatter is a high probability event. The asymmetric sides are creating different frequencies of electromagnetic radiations being in the same intensity level and compensating each other. One of these compensating ratios is the electron-proton mass ratio. The lower energy side has no compensating intensity level, it is the dark energy and the corresponding matter is the dark matter.

**Category:** Quantum Gravity and String Theory