Authors: Stephen H. Jarvis
In this series of papers on the golden ratio algorithm (phi-algorithm) for time [1-14], the concept of time as the phi-algorithm has been the core focus of topic. Through the development of the papers, the idea of the phi-algorithm for time seeking to define pi has resulted in the development a vast field of ideas covering what is perceived and measured of the natural physical world, containing equations that fit all observed data regarding the field forces for mass and energy and associated constants thereof. These results took shape from the initial premise of defining space as a “0” 3-d construct associated to time, “time” as a concept that is tagged to a basic logical construct of consciousness, namely the features of time-before, time-now, and time-after, and how that process of time from time-before to time-after can fit with the basic feature of 0-space in time-now. It was proposed that time would propagate from any point in 0-space as a spherical wavefront at a fixed rate. Now, in this paper, that assumption will be fully addressed, namely the assumption of time seeking to conform to a spherical wavefront and thus to the notion of the value of pi. This will be achieved by first addressing how words should be most precisely and efficiently used to explain the notion of space and time in detailing a just as efficient and precise use of numbers describing the process of linking a 0 reference in space to an infinite reference. Then, that description will uphold the findings of papers 1-14 [1-14], most importantly the final premise reached in paper 14 regarding natural radioactive decay. There it shall be explained exists an associated equation for time, not explicitly the phi-algorithm for time, yet an associated algorithm of its own explained in Euler’s formula. The aim here in this paper is to then propose a compromise between two time-theories as a general equation for time involving the value of “Euler’s number”, “phi”, and “pi”.
Comments: 14 Pages.
Unique-IP document downloads: 6 times
Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.