Authors: Ting-Hang Pei
We review the massive neutrino oscillation and find some problems about it. The original theory predicts the mass differences existing on three kinds of neutrinos. However, if no external energy or mass participates in the transition process, it will experience the non-conservation of mass when one neutrino transits to others and then transits back to itself again. It also violates one of the conservation of laws of energy and momentum. Furthermore, according to the conservation of momentum in the special relativity, the speeds of neutrinos before and after transition must be different because the mass is non-conserved. It results in the special physical phenomena of self-acceleration and self-deceleration. Especially, it clearly reveals the unhappened neutrino transition at some positions varying with kinetic conditions which means the massive neutrino oscillation is controlled by its kinetic value! On the other words, when the measurements are proceeded at these zero transition places, then the results show no neutrino oscillation phenomenon. Even the violation of the Lorentz invariance is proposed in the standard model extension to discuss the neutrino oscillation without the existence of the mass difference, the all other original elementary particles predicting by the standard model will lose their criteria because they seriously obey the Lorentz invariance. After reviewing the results of Super-Kamiokande Collaboration and Sudbury Neutrino Observatory, both results strongly imply the ratio of number between three kinds of neutrinos is approximately νe:νμ:ντ=1:1:1. According to this, we propose a new explanation for the observation data. The detection of neutrinos in the supernova SN 1987A event earlier than light may tell us the truth that the mass of neutrino is very possibly zero. Otherwise, the non-zero mass neutrino must be dragged by gravity to slow down its average velocity whole the traveling period.
Comments: 17 Pages.
Download: PDF
[v1] 2019-11-24 23:22:04
[v2] 2019-12-24 08:56:03
[v3] 2020-04-22 08:56:23
[v4] 2020-04-23 10:48:02
[v5] 2020-06-10 10:18:23
[v6] 2020-08-16 13:54:06
[v7] 2020-12-01 12:59:25
Unique-IP document downloads: 124 times
Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.