The present paper is a technical report on 'The Inconsistency of Arithmetic' available on http://vixra.org/abs/1904.0428. It contains a formalized analysis where the authors claim to "constitute a veriﬁed proof document" by an automated verification using the proof assistant 'Isabelle / HOL'. In order to refute the key statement (II) on page 2 of the inconsistency proof, the authors seek to create a countermodel. However, this model is based on an erroneous application of predicate logic. The crucial point is the lemma on page 7 which is proved wrongly. For that statement becoming true, the two sets S1, S2 have to exist for the case that (G) is true and for the case that (G) is false, and not the other way around: if (G) is true there is a pair of unequal sets that does the job and if (G) is false there is another pair.
Comments: 12 Pages.
[v1] 2019-10-08 07:07:54
Unique-IP document downloads: 33 times
Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.