Authors: Moshe Segal
After the presentation of the Special Relativity Theory, Mass was discovered to be a special form of Energy. Thus, after the presentation of the Special Relativity Theory, the Electric Charge remained the only distinct entity that is not Energy. This article claims that electric charges might be considered also as a form of energy. This argument is based on another claim, that if electric charges are a form of energy they must belong to a set of Energy Pairs, and the reason for that is as follows: Because charge comes in two types, a positive charge and a negative charge, then, the energy embedded in charge must also come in two energy types, which are assigned to one set of Energy Pairs. Actually, the fact that charge comes in two types might be one of the crucial reasons why it was difficult to recognize charge as another form of energy. This article starts by analyzing the energy embedded in electric and magnetic fields, and shows that such energies, which are dependent on the existence of a force field (electric or magnetic) in order to exist, can annihilate each other, in certain situations, an annihilation that seems to violate the Energy Conservation Principle. Actually, this article describes a specific physical scenario which shows a situation in which during a collision of two electromagnetic traveling waves transmissions that occur in a specific constellation, the two waves, which each contain energy, disappear, which is a clear violation of the Energy Conservation Principle. In light of the above described scenario, this article assigns the energy embedded in electric fields generated by positive charges, and energy embedded in electric fields generated by negative charges to one set of energy pairs. And, this article also assigns the energy embedded in magnetic fields generated by moving positive charges, and energy embedded in magnetic fields generated by moving negative charges to another set of energy pairs. Then, this article presents the Energy Pairs Theory, that states that energies belonging to energy pairs of equal intensities residing in the same space volume, might annihilate each other, in certain conditions. And, this article uses the Energy Pairs Theory, to explain Energy Conservation issues in electric or magnetic fields by the above mentioned statement that energies belonging to energy pairs of equal intensities residing in the same space volume, might annihilate each other, in certain conditions. Then, since the above mentioned physical scenario does show that electric or magnetic energy can be annihilated, or disappear in certain conditions, this provides a proof to the validity of the Energy Pairs Theory. Then, because energies in electric and magnetic fields are generated initially from electric charges, the Energy Pairs Theory is also used to explain the issue of charge disappearance in electron positron collisions. When an electron and a positron collide they annihilate each other and gamma ray photons are emitted, with energy equal to the sum of the energies embedded in the masses of the electron and the positron. However, the charges of the electron and the positron are not converted to any new substance (such as energy) and they simply disappear without leaving any trace of their previous existence. This charge disappearance seem to be an unusual, strange and unexpected mystery, although this charge disappearance obey the charge conservation principle. This charge disappearance is strange, because charge seem to be a basic element in physics, and such basic elements should not disappear. The Energy Pairs mentioned above provides a reasonable and logic explanation also to this charge disappearance mystery. This is done by assuming that charge is energy and energy embedded in positive charge and energy embedded in negative charge belong to one set of Energy Pairs that might annihilate each other. This also provides extra support to the assumption that charge is energy. Because, as electric or magnetic energies are shown to annihilate each other and disappear, in certain situations, positive and negative charge might also annihilate each other in certain situations, such as, in electron positron collisions, which strengthen the claim that electric charges are also a form of energy. The above described scenario can be converted, at least in principle, to a physical experiment which might provide an additional validity to the Energy Pairs Theory. This article also describes how such an experiment can be arranged. Also, the above mentioned scenario might also show that Energy Pairs might turn into some sort of Dark Energy, which is a mystery that the science of Physics seeks a solution to it. This is also presented in a separate article titled: "Energy Pairs might turn to some sort of Dark Energy" that can be found at http://viXra.org/abs/1909.0149. Also, the mutual annihilation of energies belonging to energy pairs can be viewed not only as mutual annihilation but also as mutual disabling. This idea equates the complete emptiness with substance, assuming that complete emptiness is a state in which energies of energy pairs exist and their mutual disabling is actually seen as complete emptiness. This idea also can be extended to assume that this state of complete emptiness, which actually contains energy pairs, is the eternal state of existence. And since complete emptiness is a state that do contain energies which disable each other, this concept can be further extrapolated to assume that energy pairs can evolve together from this complete emptiness, which discards the need for the concept of creation. Then, by combining the last two assumptions, the assumption that energies belonging to energy pairs residing in the same space volume might disable each other in certain conditions, and the assumption that energy pairs might evolve together from nothing in certain conditions, the energy pairs can be seen as being able to turn into some sort of the Dark Energy which might be also seen as the complete emptiness. Because, the assumption that the complete emptiness actually contains energy pairs that disable each other makes it containing energies that are untraceable, as the Dark Energy is. And, the assumption that energy pairs can emerge together from nothing (or complete emptiness) might explain how this Dark Energy is able to enter into activity, at certain conditions. In addition to using the above described coliding wave scenario, that proves the Energy Pairs Theory, which is used to support the claim that electric charges might be energy, the claim that electric charge might be energy is discussed in this article from additional angles. As will be shown in this article, there are similarities between mass and charge which might lead us to conclude that charge should also be considered as a special form of energy. Thus, this article does claim that Charge might also be recognized as another form of Energy, as mass turned to be. This claim, if found viable, and supported by additional findings, will make Energy as the only distinct entity (in addition to time and space), a simpler and cleaner view of nature. Also, analogous to the equation: E = (m * C) ^ 2 where E is energy, m is mass c is the speed of light, and ^ stands for power of Derived by the special theory of relativity, which describes the relation between the energy embedded in mass and mass magnitude, this article suggests several options of equations that might describe the relation between the energy embedded in charge and charge magnitude. These suggestions are based only on assumptions and must be supported by additional findings.
Comments: 36 Pages.
Unique-IP document downloads: 29 times
Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.