Mathematical Physics

   

On the Nature of Maxwell and Dirac Field

Authors: Vu B Ho

In this work we discuss the nature of Maxwell and Dirac field by examining the mathematical structures of the subfields that are coupled to form these two physical fields. We show that while Maxwell and Dirac field are hyperbolic fields which are described by wave equations the subfields are elliptic fields which are described by elliptic equations. Therefore, it is reasonable to suggest that the subfields are more fundamental and should be used to represent quantum particles in stable states with invariant physical properties. Furthermore, since the subfields are described by elliptic equations therefore they comply with the Euclidean relativity rather than the pseudo-Euclidean relativity as Maxwell and Dirac fields do, and this results in profound implications such as if quantum particles possess physical properties that are represented by subfields which are described by elliptic equations, hence acting in accordance with the Euclidean relativity, then they can be used to explain physical phenomena that require physical transmissions with speeds greater than the speed of light in vacuum, such as the Einstein-Podosky-Rosen paradox in quantum entanglement. As a further discussion, we also show that it is possible to formulate a Dirac-like elliptic field that complies with the Euclidean relativity.

Comments: 16 Pages.

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2019-08-24 01:14:12

Unique-IP document downloads: 24 times

Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus