Number Theory

   

The Information Paradox

Authors: Andrea Berdondini

ABSTRACT: The following paradox is based on the consideration that the value of a statistical datum does not represent a useful information, but becomes a useful information only when it is possible to proof that it was not obtained in a random way. In practice, the probability of obtaining the same result randomly must be very low in order to consider the result useful. It follows that the value of a statistical datum is something absolute but its evaluation in order to understand whether it is useful or not is something of relative depending on the actions that have been performed. So two people who analyze the same event, under the same conditions, performing two different procedures obviously find the same value, regarding a statistical parameter, but the evaluation on the importance of the data obtained will be different because it depends on the procedure used. This condition can create a situation like the one described in this paradox, where in one case it is practically certain that the statistical datum is useful, instead in the other case the statistical datum turns out to be completely devoid of value. This paradox wants to bring attention to the importance of the procedure used to extract statistical information; in fact the way in which we act affects the probability of obtaining the same result in a random way and consequently on the evaluation of the statistical parameter.

Comments: 4 Pages.

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2019-08-08 03:28:39

Unique-IP document downloads: 14 times

Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus