Authors: Atsushi Koike
According to Pierre Wantzel’s proof of 1837 that the trisection of 60 degree is impossible, because the cubic equation of x^3 - 3x - 1 = 0 had a absence of a rational solution. And his proof reached already a consensus as a general opinion. I learned from Nobukazu Shimeno’s introductory book on complex numbers that Rafael Bombelli got a rational solution x= 4 from the cubic equation x^3 = 15x + 4 based on the Cardinal formula. x^3 = 15x + 4 is x^3 - 15x - 4 = 0, which can be further replaced by x^3 - dx - a = 0. Kentaro Yano, who introduces the trisection of angles, says that the basic equation of x^3 - 3x - 1 = 0 is x^3 - dx - a = 0. In other words, the equation that Rafael Bombelli obtained a rational number solution is the same as the equation of the trisection of the angle. On the other hand, Yano raises x^3 - 3x = 0 as an example when the angle can be divided into three equal parts. Needless to say, x^3 - 3x - 0 = 0 and x^3 - dx - a = 0. Therefore, comparing Rafael Bombelli’s solution and the equation where Yano’s angle trisection is impossible and possible, the equation for angle trisection is x = a. And I found that if x = a = 2 then the solution is obtained at all angles. This paper proves that.
Comments: 14 Pages.
Unique-IP document downloads: 35 times
Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.