Why Saturn Orbital Distance = Saturn Uranus Distance?

Authors: Gerges Francis Tawdrous

Best regards When I have discovered that.. Saturn Orbital Distance = Saturn Uranus Distance I have asked Why? But the usual answer was …… It's Pure coincidence….! Later I have discovered more equalities….As the following: 1.Saturn Orbital Distance = Mars Orbital Circumference = Pluto Eccentricity distance = Saturn Uranus Distance = 1433.5 million km 2.Mercury Saturn Distance = Neptune Pluto Distance = 1375 million km 3.Saturn Pluto Distance = Mercury Neptune Distance = 4436.5 million km Then I have asked again… why These Distances Are Equal? Is there a geometrical reason behind?…but the usual answer always be …. " Pure Coincidences" The question wasn't so simple and the answer was mentioned…. I ask clearly… are the solar planets members in the same body? or parts in the same building?- shortly are the solar group as the human hand and the fingers are similar to the planets? means the planets are created and moving depending on each other because all of them consist one machine –one body –one building – one geometrical structure – means the planets aren't separated from each other– but connected with each other. (that means the space between the planets is a method to connect each planet with others and not to separate each planet from the others)…. This is my question aim! And the current theory understood that clearly… And told also a clear answer … that Any solar planet is separated from the others - each planet is found and move independently.. So the two visions are clear before our eyes ……And the fighting is clear also…. The Solar Group Classical Vision: tells us that… the planet is created independently and move by gravity with the sun without effect of the other solar planets…. My Suggested Vision Is: The Solar Group is one body – one machine – one building – one geometrical structure – No Planet can be found or move independently from the other planets …. Even the sun herself can't be found without the solar planets… we deal here with one machine – one geometrical structure- so if this geometrical structure has many elements we should be wise enough to see that these elements are members in the same geometrical structure and this structure is found by the cooperation and integration of his members….. We should fight to prove that we are correct and the current theory is mistaken… Please read the argument…

Comments: 7 Pages.

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2019-04-05 17:52:35

Unique-IP document downloads: 25 times is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus