Refutation of Affine Varieties in Zariski Topology and Denial of Grothendieck's Scheme Theory

Authors: Colin James III

From the affine varieties of Zariski topology, we evaluate two definitions. Neither is tautologous. In fact, the two definitions are equivalents. This refutes the conjecture of affine varieties in Zariski topology. Therefore the affine varieties of Zariski topology are non tautologous fragments of the universal logic VŁ4. What follows is that the scheme theory of Grothendieck is non tautologous.

Comments: 2 Pages. © Copyright 2019 by Colin James III All rights reserved. Respond to author by email only: info@cec-services dot com. See updated abstract at (We warn troll Mikko at Disqus to read the article four times before hormonal typing.)

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2019-03-14 14:08:01

Unique-IP document downloads: 101 times is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus