Planet Orbital Eccentricity Disproves the Solar Group Current Description

Authors: Gerges Francis Tawdrous

The basic challenge in the solar group study is the current description which contradicts with the solar planets data …. Simply the solar group current description is unreal…! The planet doesn’t move by gravity, and no big bang is found in the universe origin..! Solar Planet motion can't be independent from other planets motions, on the contrary the planets motions work as gears motions, each planet causes the other planet to move! In fact it's hard to examine this situation… the solar group current description is created based on the direct observation, regardless any planet data… which creates approximately a pure imaginary description… This imaginary description is created also because of the basic definitions absence…(No definitions for …. distance, time, Energy, Force, Matter, Gravity, Light Nature, Field etc..). to see much we need to examine the eclipse phenomena Example For Explanation – Total Solar Eclipse Why the total solar eclipse is occurred? i.e. Why we see the sun disc= the moon disc? The answer is known.. because (Sun Diameter / Moon Diameter) = (Earth Orbital Distance / Earth Moon Distance) Why? …..Why the diameters rate = the distances rate? Is there a relationship between the planet diameter and his orbital distance? Or Planet orbital distance is defined by gravity …?! Let's try to answer 1st Critic / Mercury – Venus – Earth ….. these 3 planets order lead us to conclude that, there's some relationship between the planet diameter and his orbital distance With a clear rule "Greater Diameter needs Greater Orbital Distance" And/ There's a similar order (but reversed). Let's see it Jupiter – Saturn – Uranus – Neptune – Pluto The previous order tells us a reversed rule "Greater Diameter needs Shorter Orbital Distance" Something is occurred with Mars which caused the rule to be reversed after Mars! But/ Uranus Diameter is Greater Than Neptune Diameter, Where Neptune Mass is Greater Than Uranus… that tells us the solar planets order is done depending on the diameter and not on the mass! disproving the gravity concept! 2nd Critic/ If the planet moves by gravity, and defines his orbital distance by the gravitation equation, which depends on the masses, Why Jupiter Isn't In Place Of Mercury? According to the gravitation equation (m/r2)? The told answer is because of the initial points!! And why we accept the gravitation equation based on that if there's no any proof for it?! 3rd Critic/ More data may help to see much better - 1092x Mercury Diameter 4879 km= 57.9 mkm Mercury Orbital Distance -1092 x Earth Diameter 12756 km= 149.6 mkm (Earth Orbital distance) -1092 x Saturn diameter 120536 km= 1433.5 mkm (Saturn Orbital Distance) -1092 x Mars diameter 6792 = 80.5 mkm (Earth – Mars distance) (2.8%) Not all planets follow directly this same equation (D= R *1092, Where D= planet orbital distance R = Planet diameter) So it can't be considered a proof for the claim But I found the previous 3 critics are strong indications lead to the conclusions Conclusions/ 1-There's A Relationship Between The Planet Diameter And his Orbital Distance 2-Mars causes Disturbance For This Relationship The previous conclusions offer a new vision with different description… how the planet diameter can have a relationship with the orbital distance?! here we face the difficult question what's the space? I answer "the Space is Energy" and we know that the matter is energy (E=mc2)… so that may help to find a relationship between the diameter and orbital distance… Then the next question will be "what event has occurred for Mars?" but the next question will be more complex… if some event occurred with Mars in the history how can we know that? My solar group alternative description is: 1.The solar group is one trajectory of Energy, each planet is a point on this same Trajectory. 2.The same Energy is seen in space and matter forms This description we should discuss deeply in this paper … So this paper offer 2 main points 1st Part -This paper uses the planet eccentricity data to show that the planet motion and orbital distance can't be found by any gravity force…. the concept was imaginary… 2nd Part -I provide an alternative description for the solar group

Comments: 15 Pages.

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2019-02-28 09:02:20

Unique-IP document downloads: 11 times is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus