Astrophysics

   

A Demonstration of the Titius-Bode Law, the Number of Saturn’s Rings and the Radius of Fine-Ring by Newtonian Methods Using the Kerr-Newman Solution of the General Relativity Theory

Authors: Fumitaka Inuyama.

The beautiful Titius–Bode law (ξ=0.4+0.3×2^n ) , discovered 250 years ago, is considered to be a mathematical coincidence rather than an "exact" law, because it has not yet been physically proved. However, considering the disturbance restoration and the stability of the asteroid belt orbit, there must be some underlying logical necessity. Planetary orbits are often computed by Newtonian mechanics with the kinetic energy and the universal gravitation energy. However, applying the principle of energy-minimum to the Newtonian mechanics leads to the result that the stable orbital radius is only one value, which is totally incompatible with actual phenomena. This discrepancy must result from the shortage of elements which rule over the planetary orbits. Other elements to rule over the planetary orbits are the electric charge energy and the rotation energy, both of which are guided by the Kerr-Newman solution (discovered in 1965) of the general relativity theory. Here, I mathematically demonstrated the Titius-Bode law, and also calculated the number of Saturn’s rings, maximum 31 and the radius of Fine-Ring, by applying the principle of energy-minimum of Newtonian methods to the complicated energy equation which adopts mass, electric charge and rotation elements of the central core star and solving sole differential equation.

Comments: 11 Pages.

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2019-02-18 23:40:05
[v2] 2019-05-23 19:08:27
[v3] 2019-07-07 04:26:51

Unique-IP document downloads: 20 times

Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus