Relativity and Cosmology

   

Better and Deeper Quantum Mechanics! Thoughts on a New Definition of Momentum That Makes Physics Simpler and More Consistent

Authors: Espen Gaarder Haug

We suggest that momentum should be redefined in order to help make physics more consistent and more logical. In this paper, we propose that there is a rest-mass momentum, a kinetic momentum, and a total momentum. This leads directly to a simpler relativistic energy–momentum relation. As we point out, it is the Compton wavelength that is the true wavelength for matter; the de Broglie wavelength is mostly a mathematical artifact. This observation leads us to a new relativistic wave equation and a new and likely better QM. Further, we show that Minkowski space-time is unnecessarily complex and that a simplified, special case of Minkowski space-time is more consistent with the quantum world. Also, we show how the Heisenberg principle breaks down at the Planck scale, which opens this area of physics up for hidden variable theories once again. Many of the mystical interpretations in modern QM are rooted in the development of an unnecessarily complex theory that drives much speculation and is therefore subject to many different and even conflicting interpretations.

Comments: 18 Pages.

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2018-12-26 18:48:16
[v2] 2018-12-28 02:07:03
[v3] 2018-12-28 17:44:17
[v4] 2018-12-29 17:43:18
[v5] 2018-12-31 09:02:12
[v6] 2019-01-01 18:28:51
[v7] 2019-01-08 04:33:00
[v8] 2019-01-10 17:24:56
[v9] 2019-01-12 06:14:53
[vA] 2019-01-13 16:59:33
[vB] 2019-01-26 17:28:11
[vC] 2019-01-28 01:09:18

Unique-IP document downloads: 265 times

Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus