Quantum Physics


A Major Solution to Newton's Search May Mark the Future of Space Travel

Authors: Savior F. Eason

3x2(9yz)4a^inf(A)*(R)<=>RSF That is the solution to an infamous thought experiment posited by scientist Dr. Ivan Axes as a rebuke to einstein's theories, as provided "theoretical proof" in 1955 that einstein was incorrect in his equations of energy and time, and that newton's assessment of absolute time and seperate space were both still correct. The thought experiment explained how perception could not define one's temporal state or arrow based on well-proven laws of physics. The thought experiment is not really taken seriously among scientists today, mainly because einstein's equations are so well-proven and supported by actual physical tests the thought experiment was established as irrelevant long ago. However, upon further investigation, I believe this thought experiment has more meat to it than previously thought, and I developed an equation proposing how an n-dimensional field of hypermass in which space-time function differently would create a new form of kinetic energy, which would not only explain away dark energy, but could, with the correct technology, take us across the observable universe and far beyond, a sci-fi like acheivement once restricted to the realm of dreams and science-fiction writing. This papers discusses more on my fissured gen-mortaic science work, this theory, and it's possible applications in just decades, making a star wars-like civilization once millenia away a reality for our grandchildren, in a 64 pages long postulation of this formula and an accompanying thought experiment for the holidays.

Comments: 64 Pages. Some claims in this paper have not been proven or fully studied, though thorough extensive testing has proven most true. Take some claims with a grain of salt

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2018-12-24 14:54:09

Unique-IP document downloads: 11 times

Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus