Refutation of the Planar Eucleadian R-Geometry of Tarski

Authors: Colin James III

We evaluate the axioms of the title. The axiom of identity of betweenness and axiom Euclid are tautologous, but the others are not. The commonplace expression of the axiom of Euclid does not match its other two variations which is troubling. This effectively refutes the planar R-geometry.

Comments: 3 Pages. © Copyright 2016-2018 by Colin James III All rights reserved. Updated abstract at . Respond to the author by email at: info@ersatz-systems dot com.

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2018-12-05 19:29:23

Unique-IP document downloads: 5 times is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus