**Authors:** Gerges Francis Tawdrous

In my previous paper Kepler 3rd Law Explanation (a Claim against Nobel Prize Board Decision in Physics 2018) http://vixra.org/abs/1810.0053 I have discussed another vision for Kepler 3rd law… In that paper I claimed, Kepler 3rd Law proves that, the solar group is one machine or one body where each planet should be considered as a member in this same body… Also I claimed, Kepler 3rd law contradicts Newton Mechanics basically because Newton Mechanics considers each planet is separated and independent from other planets in his data and motion where the gravity forces produce the harmony in their motions… In this paper we'll discuss one more question …let's ask it here? Do we understand correctly Kepler Laws' Vision? And why we misunderstood them? Let's see deeply as possible… Kepler stated a clear rule that, "The Planet Velocity varies inversely with his Orbital Distance" What did we conclude from this rule? The force is related to the sun, So The further Planet from the sun the slower velocity he has….! The meaning is clear ….. this idea is the base on which the gravity concept is created Let's try to see Kepler 3rd Law with more depth… d3/t2 = constant (C) (Kepler 3rd Law) But we know that… a (acceleration) = d/t2 ……that means…… a (acceleration) x d2 = constant i.e. d2 = Constant / a (acceleration)(I) The equation tells us that, the planet acceleration various inversely with his squared orbital distance! Is this meaning = the previous one?! The Space is Energy Can we deduce another vision from Equation No. I ?! Let's use my description to explain this Equation….let remember it… -The solar group is one body each planet is a member in this body -The mass is Energy (E=mc2), and the space is energy (my hypothesis), and planet motion needs energy… -The mass and distance are created from the same energy which guarantees the planets motions general harmony. Now let's suppose that, -Each planet has an equal amount of Energy for these 3 purposes (mass, distance and motion) That means More area from the sun needs more energy which means the planet velocity will be decreased because the mass energy is fixed and can't be changed in ordinary cases … That's the meaning we have got from Equation No. (I) which told us the area (not distance) varies inversely with the planet motion acceleration…. Deep Discussion I try here to explain the negative effects which are resulted because of basic definitions absence Where we have no definitions of Space, matter, time …etc and have no explanation how the matter is created or by what mechanism the gravity works…. Many basics were ignored in the way to create a description for the solar group Geometry and the result of this process is to create an imaginary description has no proof. Again I try to attribute this process to Newton Mechanics and not to Kepler Laws…. Let's read C.M.Linton words while he claim that kepler knew there's a relationship between the planet diameter and his orbital distance….. "Kepler thus assumed that the volumes of the planets were proportional to their distances to the sun and the quantity of matter they contained to the square root of this distance, so that planetary densities varied inversely as square root of the orbital radius and is this ad hoc way be could reproduced his third law (T2 varies with a3) and absorb into physical Astronomy" "From Eudexus to Einstein A history of Mathematical astronomy" (page 198-199) C.M. Linton – Cambridge university Press… From that, we can conclude Kepler Laws were created in environment tried to define the matter origin and creation… So, the gravity force description which assumes that each planet is independent from the others… this description is the strange one from Kepler Laws environment, that tells us, Kepler laws were cut from their environment to be used in strange environment can't provide its basics… So again the contradiction is clear enough… Kepler Laws provide a description for the solar group as one body or one machine where the planets integrate with each other to provide the motions general harmony, at the contrary Newton Mechanics provides a vision of separated points (separated plants) which cause difficulties to provide the motions general harmony. This paper tries to answer 2 questions 1-Why d3/t2 = constant? 2-Why the inner planets are distinguished from the outer planets? Gerges Francis Tawdrous TEL +201022532292 E-mailgeorgytawdrous@yandex.ru Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1 Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous

**Comments:** 9 Pages.

**Download:** **PDF**

[v1] 2018-10-29 18:28:13

**Unique-IP document downloads:** 43 times

Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

**Add your own feedback and questions here:**

*You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful. *